-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Audio
Register FAQ Community
Car Audio Do you live in your car? Then you need to be able to listen to some high-quality music.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:48 PM
oraxid24124 oraxid24124 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
which would be better? (boxes)

alright my ? is which is louder.....i am fairly new to car audio being i just got a car last year.......a sealed box or a ported?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2005, 06:50 PM
sr20de4evr's Avatar
sr20de4evr sr20de4evr is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

ported
__________________
'01 Black Sentra SE
Weapon-R intake, HS header, HKS catback, ES motor mounts, B&M short shifter, Tein coilovers
Alpine 9835, Adire Koda 6.1, Adire Brahma 15, Arc 2100cxl, Linear Power 2.2hv, Cadence ZRS-8

'05 Silver WRX STi
Injen SES Downpipe, HKS Carbon-Ti catback, Cobb Stage 2 Tune, TiC Super Shifter, TiC Klunk Killer, Tein springs, Nitto NT555R Drag Radials
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:11 PM
bumpinstang77's Avatar
bumpinstang77 bumpinstang77 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to bumpinstang77
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

in order.... IB, sealed, ported, T-line, 4th order b-pass, 6th-order bpass. Take into consideration that each enclosure degrades in sound quality in that order with the exception of a transmission line, which is better then regualr ported in SQ.... but very difficult to correctly build.
__________________
2002 Ford Explorer Limited
D31 yellow top
Kenwood DDX-7017
2 Ascendant Audio Avalanche 18's
13 cuft NET ported box tuned to 27hz
Autotek Mean Machine MX3000.1
Ascendant Audio Arco component set
Orion 275SX (Mids)
PPI Art Series A200 (tweets)
Poly Mids for rear fill to come soon.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:21 PM
Mannyb18b's Avatar
Mannyb18b Mannyb18b is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 918
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mannyb18b Send a message via MSN to Mannyb18b
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

what about snail shell
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:24 PM
oraxid24124 oraxid24124 is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 91
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

yea i was thinkin ported but some friends said sealed
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:28 PM
bumpinstang77's Avatar
bumpinstang77 bumpinstang77 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to bumpinstang77
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

sealed sucks IMO ....snail shells are transmission lines.
__________________
2002 Ford Explorer Limited
D31 yellow top
Kenwood DDX-7017
2 Ascendant Audio Avalanche 18's
13 cuft NET ported box tuned to 27hz
Autotek Mean Machine MX3000.1
Ascendant Audio Arco component set
Orion 275SX (Mids)
PPI Art Series A200 (tweets)
Poly Mids for rear fill to come soon.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:31 PM
Mannyb18b's Avatar
Mannyb18b Mannyb18b is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 918
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mannyb18b Send a message via MSN to Mannyb18b
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

Ya thats what i was thinkin too, jus didnt know thats what they were called. To me, sealed is just a way of hookin up a sub quickly n simply. Many people will argue that sealed is pure sound quality, but i think a properly built ported enclosure can sound just as good, SS specially.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:39 PM
sr20de4evr's Avatar
sr20de4evr sr20de4evr is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: which would be better? (boxes)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mannyb18b
Many people will argue that sealed is pure sound quality, but i think a properly built ported enclosure can sound just as good
as far as transient response goes, sure, but as for upper bass, low bass, and flat frequency response in a car, not a chance in hell
__________________
'01 Black Sentra SE
Weapon-R intake, HS header, HKS catback, ES motor mounts, B&M short shifter, Tein coilovers
Alpine 9835, Adire Koda 6.1, Adire Brahma 15, Arc 2100cxl, Linear Power 2.2hv, Cadence ZRS-8

'05 Silver WRX STi
Injen SES Downpipe, HKS Carbon-Ti catback, Cobb Stage 2 Tune, TiC Super Shifter, TiC Klunk Killer, Tein springs, Nitto NT555R Drag Radials
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:55 PM
dean,can dean,can is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

sealed boxes:deep and accurate . sealed boxes tend to need a lot of power.it all depends on how the woofer matches the box.deep bass extensions and excellent power handing (ported boxes) deep and lively ported boxes use amplifier power more efficiently.you get more output than you would from a comparable sealed box at anu given amplifier wattage
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2005, 07:58 PM
dean,can dean,can is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

bandpass boxes are rap monsters.(bandpass boxes are very efficient.)boxes are usually very loud and often very boomy,are designed for maximum thump .
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-19-2005, 08:59 PM
bumpinstang77's Avatar
bumpinstang77 bumpinstang77 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to bumpinstang77
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

Ported tuned low can sound just as good as sealed AS LONG AS you have VERY strong midbasses to keep up starting around 60hz
__________________
2002 Ford Explorer Limited
D31 yellow top
Kenwood DDX-7017
2 Ascendant Audio Avalanche 18's
13 cuft NET ported box tuned to 27hz
Autotek Mean Machine MX3000.1
Ascendant Audio Arco component set
Orion 275SX (Mids)
PPI Art Series A200 (tweets)
Poly Mids for rear fill to come soon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-19-2005, 09:18 PM
CBFryman's Avatar
CBFryman CBFryman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,705
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to CBFryman Send a message via Yahoo to CBFryman
Re: Re: which would be better? (boxes)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dean,can
sealed boxes:deep and accurate . sealed boxes tend to need a lot of power.it all depends on how the woofer matches the box.deep bass extensions and excellent power handing (ported boxes) deep and lively ported boxes use amplifier power more efficiently.you get more output than you would from a comparable sealed box at anu given amplifier wattage
Incorrect.
A properly built ported box is just as accurate as a sealed box. T/S parameters ultamitle determine what enclosure will be optimal but generally for car stereo Bass Reflux is the best (ported)

As far as loudness goes order is as follows.
IB, Sealed, Ported, 4th Order Bandpass, TL, Horn, 6th Order Bandpass.

IB: Great SQ. Because you do not utilize sound waves coming fro mthe rear of the cone you automoaticly loose 3dB.

Sealed: Personally i dont like how they sound. they have a flatter responce but it is also not as loud and the -3dB drop off often comes long before you even get near dabbleing in Infrabass frequincies. Of coruse you wont be listening to Music with 15Hz tones so unless you are a home theatre buff these work fine. They are the simplest to construct and calculate for unless your are looking for the best responce curve or a peak at a certian Fs.

Ported: aka 4th order bas reflux. The first to utilize the energy from the rear of the cone. High tuning allows for high SPL but doesnt do much for low extension because the responce drops off like a cliff around 1/2 octave below tuning. SQ is equal to that of a sealed enclosure if properly constructed and calulated, i also prefer the sound of ported.

4th Order bandpass: Though it doesnt utilize the waves from the rear of the cone the port works with great efficency in its frequincy band. SQ is saccrifecd because the narrow frequincy band makes bass with any ammount of frequincy range sound "Boomy" if improperly integraded into the stereo. If properly integraded into the stereo it can actually sound very good.

Transmission Line: These are really amazing enclosures. Tey are basically one big port from the back of the woofer on. They work with great efficnecy. This is because there is perfect delay time between front cone excursion and rear cone waves reaching open space. Spectacualr SQ (that of IB) if properly constructed. The whole idea is to make the line 1/2 or 1/4 the wavelength of the desired tune frequincy with the exact "port" area of the cone. These will give a 6dB gain at and around tuning frequincy and 3-6dB everywhere else.drivers with low overall Q work wonders in these.

Horn: Great SQ, Awsome bass, amazing enclsoures. downfall? they are extremely large. cone mouth must have a diameter of 1/2 Fs for optimal eficency. What does that mean? you want to tune to 20Hz... the wave length of 20Hz is 56.35ft. that is a mouth diameter of just over 28ft. Not propable for home use. It cane be cut down to 1/4 for 1/2 the efficiency (still very efficent) but that is still a very large mouth. Ever been to a rock concert? noticed thoes giant boxes on or next to the stage? figure out they are what are pumping out that massive ammount of bass? thoes are bass horns. it is possible ot make a very efficent horn for home use but it isnt propable for car stereo use. (as a matter of fact i know a guy who got 116dB in room from 23w and a JL w0 10)

6th Order. Extremely efficent, horribly peaky responce curve. often 2 different tunnings are used to help flatten it out. Adire Tempst 6th order calulated by Win ISD.... you figure it out. 1st one is with tuning at 20Hz and 100Hz and hte second one at 40 and the other at 41. im getting some SPL ideas.





Edit: sorry, i put an SPL chart on the 1st one.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-19-2005, 09:30 PM
CBFryman's Avatar
CBFryman CBFryman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,705
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to CBFryman Send a message via Yahoo to CBFryman
Re: which would be better? (boxes)

After messing adound in WinISD i was able to get a peak gian of [email protected] by making the Front chamber 101l and hte rear 100l and the front Fs 45Hz and the rear 47Hz....now these figures arent real world but according to this i should be making 121.4dB from 1w with a tempest..... of course WinISD also says a tempest will get louder than a Brahma untill you give the brahama nearly 75% more power. ie the tempest has 400w and the brahma has 700w. in a ported enclosure the brahma would have maxed out its suspension by then..... hmmmmm....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-19-2005, 10:55 PM
sr20de4evr's Avatar
sr20de4evr sr20de4evr is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: Re: which would be better? (boxes)

Ported tuned low can sound just as good as sealed AS LONG AS you have VERY strong midbasses to keep up starting around 60hz
sure, if by very strong midbass you mean they can out perform the sub by 10-15dB from 50hz+. This is physically impossible unless you have
1) ported door pods
2) multiple midbasses
3) some INSANE midbass drivers like the xxx, extremis, or anything very good that's 8" or larger (dls iridium 8.x, dynaudio system 360, PG titanium 951, those are all that I know of, and even those probably wouldn't be able to do it)

A properly built ported box is just as accurate as a sealed box.
accurate how?
if you mean being "quick" then yes, if you mean accurate as in playing what was intended as accurately as possible, definitely not

but generally for car stereo Bass Reflux is the best
absolutely not
ported is best for home where the flat anechoic response resembles the actual in-room response very closely. You stick a ported box in a car and the cabin gain will screw it up royally. With some SEVERE EQing you can tame the response so it's relatively flat, but this will take a lot of processing power. Meanwhile, all you have to do is drop a decent sub in a decent sealed box and you have a near perfect in-car response right away. When I put my brahma in the car I measured the response, and apart from a small 2dB drop at 31hz, it's bone flat from the high teens to the 50hz lowpass. If you can take ANY sub in ANY ported box and pull a response like that, I will paypal you $10 right now (just because I'm determined doesn't mean I'm not poor )
__________________
'01 Black Sentra SE
Weapon-R intake, HS header, HKS catback, ES motor mounts, B&M short shifter, Tein coilovers
Alpine 9835, Adire Koda 6.1, Adire Brahma 15, Arc 2100cxl, Linear Power 2.2hv, Cadence ZRS-8

'05 Silver WRX STi
Injen SES Downpipe, HKS Carbon-Ti catback, Cobb Stage 2 Tune, TiC Super Shifter, TiC Klunk Killer, Tein springs, Nitto NT555R Drag Radials
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-20-2005, 12:31 AM
sr20de4evr's Avatar
sr20de4evr sr20de4evr is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: which would be better? (boxes)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBFryman
the tempest has 400w and the brahma has 700w. in a ported enclosure the brahma would have maxed out its suspension by then..... hmmmmm....
the brahma would be bottoming out with 700rms ported?
I hope you mean the tempest, because ported the brahma would be able to take the full 1500 or more as long as you're talking about above tuning. Even sealed the brahma can handle more than 700rms before bottoming unless it's in a HUGE enclosure, and ported drastically reduces the excursion, especially around tuning.
__________________
'01 Black Sentra SE
Weapon-R intake, HS header, HKS catback, ES motor mounts, B&M short shifter, Tein coilovers
Alpine 9835, Adire Koda 6.1, Adire Brahma 15, Arc 2100cxl, Linear Power 2.2hv, Cadence ZRS-8

'05 Silver WRX STi
Injen SES Downpipe, HKS Carbon-Ti catback, Cobb Stage 2 Tune, TiC Super Shifter, TiC Klunk Killer, Tein springs, Nitto NT555R Drag Radials
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Audio


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts