|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
01-26-2002, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
CRX + Vortec = good idea??
I didnt know Vortec made a supercharger for the B16a till tonight..... gets me thinking..... what would the cost difference be in turbo vs. supercharging..... would a supercharger be any cheaper to run on my 91 CRX Si w/ b16a swap....??
|
|
#2
01-27-2002, 10:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
superchargers are generally 800-1000 $$ less then the turbo for the same model, but it takes longer to get the power band, and it uses the engine to power it, instead of unused gases, plus you get more power from a turbo then an SC.
__________________
Name: Scott Stable Of Cars I have Owned: 1991 Honda CRX 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2003 Honda Accord 1998 Chrysler Concorde 2007 Honda Civic 1997 Toyota Camry 1995 Saturn SC2 1996 Ford Taurus 1991 GMC Sierra 2002 Daewoo Leganza 1999 Dodge Ram 2007 Honda CR-V 2003 BMW 325i
|
|
#3
01-27-2002, 03:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Superchargers are good for instant power but yea they do use motor power compared to a turbo which is gases. A supercharger is ok, but in the long run, a turbo would be much better.
__________________
2004 Sonic Blue Ford Ranger XLT 2001 Liquid Grey Metallic Ford Focus ZX3 1995 Integra GS-R - Parting out
|
|
#4
01-27-2002, 07:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
get a TURBO diffinetly
 i wish i had money for even a supercharger
__________________
Kyle Cox  project eg hatch in progress http://www.nsmotosports.cjb.com :badass:
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
