-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction
Register FAQ Community
Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-23-2004, 08:47 PM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Forced induction? Compression?

Ok I got 2 questions that have really puzzled me:

1) How do I lower the compression of an engine? Stroking and boring will only increase horsepower and torque right?

2) What does F/I do? I know it shoves more air into the cylinders, but what's the point when you are going to lower the compression just so the engine doesn't detonate? Doesn't compression = power? An N/A engine has high compression, but no blower, a turbo'd engine has low compression but the turbo will blow air into it, how does a turbo have SOOO much more power if it cannot squeeze anymore air into a cylinder than a high compression engine would?

Oh and one more question:

Why do superchargers have blow-off valves? I don't see much of a reason to have one
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2004, 04:29 PM
2turboimports's Avatar
2turboimports 2turboimports is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

1) compression really depends on a number of things. You could lower compression with a thicker headgasket, new pistons, larger bore. But it all really works hand in hand.

2) Power is also gained with VE (volumetric efficiency). Turboed cars can reach a higher volumetric efficiency since air is being forced into the heads. It's always a big choice to make when deciding on compression. some say 8.0:1 is good for top end turbo power and others say 8.5 - 9.0:1 is good for topend and nice for some bottom torque. With lower compression the engine will be able to flow a lot more air, more flow = more top end, but the trade off is loss of low end torque since you're relying more on the turbo for hp.

i hope this makes some sense, if there are any errors, someone correct me please. t hanks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2004, 04:42 PM
matt11583 matt11583 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

turbos compress air to get more air into the same size area. the more air, the more fuel. lower compress normally does mean higher top end.turbos have more power because they have a bigger top end. they dont have ass much as n/as at low end power. off the line a n/a will beat it, then later the turbo will catch up when the turbo starts spooling.

superchargers have bovs to make sure that it doesnt put too much air into teh engine. if there is more air than it can put in, the bov will open to let the extra air out.
pistons and headgaskets are the best way to lower compression.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2004, 05:06 PM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

Well, thanks guys, it was good to know
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2004, 12:25 AM
Sluttypatton's Avatar
Sluttypatton Sluttypatton is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have quoted Corky Bell on this topic before and I will do it again:
"CHANGING A COMPRESSION RATIO. A variety of methods exist to change a compression ratio. Almost all are unacceptable. The crux of the matter is upsetting the "squish volume" around the rim of the chamber. A chamber is designed so that the charge is pushed toward its center as the piston achieves top dead center. This is perhaps the strongest deterrent to detonation designed into the system, as it tends to either eliminate end gas or keep charge turbulence high. This squish volume is a rim about .3 to .4 inch wide around the chamber, an approximately .04 thick-a big, washer-shaped volume between piston and head. Consider "squish volume" sacred and do not tamper. It is possible to err so badly in removing the squish that a resulting 7-to-l compression ratio may ping worse than a 9-to-l with proper squish. Clearly then, choices for reducing compression ratio are limited to opening up selected parts of the head side on the chamber, installing a new piston with a dish in the center, or remachining the original piston to create a dish. It is perhaps a little risky to undertake remachining a combustion chamber, because the thickness of the material is usually unknown. Furthermore, chamber shapes are closely controlled features of most modern engines. If the chamber must be recut, ultrasonic inspection can determine the material thickness. Commercial inspection service companies frequently offer this service. An entirely new piston, with the required dish that maintains the squish volume, is a proper approach. Machining a dish into the original piston is sound, provided the top thickness is adequate. A reasonable rule would require the top thickness to be at least 6% of the bore. Approaches to lowering the compression ratio that do not work are thicker head gaskets and shorter connecting rods."

Boring a cylinder actually increases the compression ratio, since you are increasing the displacement of the cylinders but not the cylinder head into which the air fuel mixture is compressed.

Lowering the compression ratio is a bad thing to do since it does kill power and it is by no means necessary in order to avoid detonation. Only high compression ratio's may need to be cut in order to avoid detonation, but many people have had success even in the 9:1 range.
__________________
Beer tastes better upside down.
Last edited by Sluttypatton on 13-54-2098 at 25:75 PM.

Last edited by Sluttypatton; 05-25-2004 at 03:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-2004, 12:38 AM
SaabJohan SaabJohan is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

The compression ratio of an engine doesn't affect air mass flow through the engine, however, using both high compression and high boost pressure will give very high in cylinder pressures. For an otto engine the pressure can't be too high since that will cause detonation after the air fuel mixture is ignited when the pressure and temperature are increasing even further.
So when using high compression ratios in turbocharged engines this often means that the ignition must be retarded and the fuel mixture must be rich to supress knock. This causes temperature problems due to the later ignition and also an increased fuel consumption during boost due to the ignition and richer fuel mixture. Most modern roadgoing turbocharged engines are built this way which mean that they can run with a better efficiency of boost while still have the power that is needed sometimes.

Turbocharged racing cars are often built with a low compression ratio, this allows the to use high boost pressures, a leaner mixture when boosted and a more advanced ignition timing. This allows the cars to run more efficient during boost with increased power and a lower fuel consumption. The downside is that the won't run that well when off boost.

The compression ratio is a volume ratio, that is the difference in volume between when the piston is at top dead center and at bottom dead center.
The volume at TDC is the volume of the combustion chamber and the volume at BDC is the displacement of a cylinder + the combustion chamber volume; the compression ratio is therefore (combustion chamber volume + displacement)/combustion chamber volume.

But wait, there is more to it. In an engine bore, stroke, con-rod length, squish zones and so on affect the engine in many ways when thay are changed. For example, if we use a thicker head gasket to lower the compression ratio this will also increase the clearence between the piston and cylinder head. Those surfaces that are near eachother at TDC are called squish zones and the cause turbulence and also help to cool the air fuel mixture between them, this can affect combustion speed, engine knock and so on. Usually a little more distance between the surfaces are wanted for full throttle (racing engines) but a smaller distance are wanted for part throttle (road cars), so there are many things to think of when something is altered.

Superchargers can both use blow off valves and pop off valves. The blow off valve is used like on a turbocharged engine and it's only used if the supercharger is placed before the throttle. A pop off valve will open when a certain boost pressure has been reached, and it can therby limit the boost pressure.

Before the turbocharger starts to deliver boost the engine will basicly have the power curve like an NA engine, and then when the turbo can deliver boost the pressure in the intake manifold will be higher than for a NA engine. When the pressure is higher the density of the air is also higher so one liter of air will at 2 atm (about 28 psi) have the same denisty as 2 litres of air at 1 atm (about 14 psi).

The larger the turbo is the more air it can deliver and the more power can be made with it, however, when a larger turbocharger is used it will start to deliver boost at a higher engine speed.

Gasoline engines are what is called unstable at boost, this since the fuel is regulated to match the airflow. So when the turbo starts to delivre air more fuel will be added with then cuases the turbocharger to deliver even more air until a boost pressure where the increase in power consumption from the compressor will be higher than the extra power delivered from the turbine (usually something has broken before this).
In diesel engines the fuel isn't regulated to the air, they are therefore stable at boost and of this reason they don't need any wastegate if the turbocharger is matched for the engine.
Of there simple reasons it can be easy to understand that the boost pressure in a gasoline engine is very dependant on the amount the throttle is open.

When the engine is at a speed where the turbocharger can deliver boost it will take some time until the turbocharger delivers full boost, called "turbo lag". The lag is dependant on the turbocharger and on the engine which the turbocharger is connected to, but it is also dependant on the amount of boost, the higher the boost used are the longer it will take for the turbocharger to reach full boost.

Since you don't want any lag there are several methods to make the lag as short as possibly, among these I can mention ball bearings and variable geometry. But in racing cars there are also other methods so that boost, full or partial can be delivered then the driver gives full throttle. Those "anti lag" methods are often used in racing like drag racing and rally, which for example means that the turbochargers are already delivering boost while a dragracing car is standning still at the line.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2004, 01:02 AM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sluttypatton
I have quoted Corky Bell on this topic before and I will do it again:
"CHANGING A COMPRESSION RATIO. A variety of methods exist to change a compression ratio. Almost all are unacceptable. The crux of the matter is upsetting the "squish volume" around the rim of the chamber. A chamber is designed so that the charge is pushed toward its center as the piston achieves top dead center. This is perhaps the strongest deterrent to detonation designed into the system, as it tends to either eliminate end gas or keep charge turbulence high. This squish volume is a rim about .3 to .4 inch wide around the chamber, an approximately .04 thick-a big, washer-shaped volume between piston and head. Consider "squish volume" sacred and do not tamper. It is possible to err so badly in removing the squish that a resulting 7-to-l compression ratio may ping worse than a 9-to-l with proper squish. Clearly then, choices for reducing compression ratio are limited to opening up selected parts of the head side on the chamber, installing a new piston with a dish in the center, or remachining the original piston to create a dish. It is perhaps a little risky to undertake remachining a combustion chamber, because the thickness of the material is usually unknown. Furthermore, chamber shapes are closely controlled features of most modern engines. If the chamber must be recut, ultrasonic inspection can determine the material thickness. Commercial inspection service companies frequently offer this service. An entirely new piston, with the required dish that maintains the squish volume, is a proper approach. Machining a dish into the original piston is sound, provided the top thickness is adequate. A reasonable rule would require the top thickness to be at least 6% of the bore. Approaches to lowering the compression ratio that do not work are thicker head gaskets and shorter connecting rods."

Lowering the compression ratio is a bad thing to do since it does kill power and it is by no means necessary in order to avoid detonation. Only high compression ratio's may need to be cut in order to avoid detonation, but many people have had success even in the 9:1 range.
I know ratios are proportioned, but what is "squish volume", or this "dish"?

Why are you saying that lowering compression doesn't help stop detonation in a turbo car? Are you implying that a high compression turbo car can be less prone to detonation than a low compression turbo car? Doesn't air heat up when it is being compressed?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2004, 01:17 AM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Forced induction? Compression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaabJohan
So when using high compression ratios in turbocharged engines this often means that the ignition must be retarded and the fuel mixture must be rich to supress knock. This causes temperature problems due to the later ignition and also an increased fuel consumption during boost due to the ignition and richer fuel mixture. Most modern roadgoing turbocharged engines are built this way which mean that they can run with a better efficiency of boost while still have the power that is needed sometimes.
Are you saying that as long as the ignition is retarded and the the fuel mixture is more rich, I can make the compression as high as I want to?

Quote:
Turbocharged racing cars are often built with a low compression ratio, this allows the to use high boost pressures, a leaner mixture when boosted and a more advanced ignition timing. This allows the cars to run more efficient during boost with increased power and a lower fuel consumption. The downside is that the won't run that well when off boost.
So by lowering compression, I can run leaner and advance the ignition timing? Isn't running lean a bad thing? Does it not cause detonation?

Quote:
But wait, there is more to it. In an engine bore, stroke, con-rod length, squish zones and so on affect the engine in many ways when thay are changed. For example, if we use a thicker head gasket to lower the compression ratio this will also increase the clearence between the piston and cylinder head. Those surfaces that are near eachother at TDC are called squish zones and the cause turbulence and also help to cool the air fuel mixture between them, this can affect combustion speed, engine knock and so on. Usually a little more distance between the surfaces are wanted for full throttle (racing engines) but a smaller distance are wanted for part throttle (road cars), so there are many things to think of when something is altered.
I thought that lowering compression with thicker gaskets, and bigger piston rods were bad? Why would having a thicker gasket be better for full throttle?

Quote:
Superchargers can both use blow off valves and pop off valves. The blow off valve is used like on a turbocharged engine and it's only used if the supercharger is placed before the throttle. A pop off valve will open when a certain boost pressure has been reached, and it can therby limit the boost pressure.
So a popoff valve will open when there's too much pressure, and the blow-off valve opens up when there's too much pressure, but keeps the supercharger spinning? Now I am confused .
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-25-2004, 01:23 AM
Sluttypatton's Avatar
Sluttypatton Sluttypatton is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Those weren't my words, I merely quoted a respected author because he has said it so much better than I can without taking a long time to write it out my self. But yes, if the compression ratio is improperly changed, it is possible that it will detonate worse. This is fairly uncommon unless you really fudged up the job, however it is possible.

You are correct that the more a gas is compressed, the hotter it gets, however there are more forces at work inside the combustion chamber than just compression, these also help to reduce detonation. SaabJohan touched on them in his post.
__________________
Beer tastes better upside down.
Last edited by Sluttypatton on 13-54-2098 at 25:75 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-25-2004, 01:32 AM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

So... We don't know what squish volume, or what dish means?

What other forces inside help stop detonation? Retarding ignition ? running rich? I know running rich will help stop detonation, but retarding timing only helps reduce hotspots. Don't cylinders detonate due to the air being hot enough from compression to set off the fuel?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-25-2004, 01:48 AM
Sluttypatton's Avatar
Sluttypatton Sluttypatton is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There is a whole new set of problems incorporated with retarding the ignition timing, so while retarding ignition timing can be a valuable tool when tuning a motor, one must keep it within reason. Also keep in mind that retarding the ignition timing kills power.

Running lean is bad for a few reasons, but good for one main reason. Running lean can cause detonation in motor that isn't set up to safely do so, however motors actually make the most power when they run a little leaner than 14.7:1, somewhere around 12:1. The reason 14.7:1 is used on road cars is because that is where vehicles make the lowest emissions, and it gives better detonation resistance.

As for lowering the compression ratio with rods and gaskets, it is bad if you don't know what you are doing. I never said it was impossible to do, just that if you don't know what you are doing you can mess up the squish area and actually make your engine more prone to detonation. SaabJohan was a little more specific in that area, I believe he was saying that the relationship between the parts in the combustion chamber is complicated and have a very synergetic effect, changing one thing may change the whole dynamics of the combustion chamber.

Remember that on turbocharged cars, blow off valves are not used to control boost levels, just vent the pressure that builds up at the throttle plate when it is closed, and prevent compressor surge. However, pop off valves are like radiator caps, they open when the pressure reaches a preset level, these can be used to control boost to the engine, as once the boost pressure reaches a certain level they will open and vent excess boost to the atmosphere.
__________________
Beer tastes better upside down.
Last edited by Sluttypatton on 13-54-2098 at 25:75 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-25-2004, 01:55 AM
Sluttypatton's Avatar
Sluttypatton Sluttypatton is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A dish is just that, a concave curve in the piston, designed to lower the compression ratio.

Squish volume is described in the quote I posted by Corky Bell: "The crux of the matter is upsetting the "squish volume" around the rim of the chamber. A chamber is designed so that the charge is pushed toward its center as the piston achieves top dead center. This is perhaps the strongest deterrent to detonation designed into the system, as it tends to either eliminate end gas or keep charge turbulence high. This squish volume is a rim about .3 to .4 inch wide around the chamber, an approximately .04 thick-a big, washer-shaped volume between piston and head."

By the way, I edited my first post, I was wrong about the bore's effect on compression ratio because I forgot about the unchanged combustion chamber volume.
__________________
Beer tastes better upside down.
Last edited by Sluttypatton on 13-54-2098 at 25:75 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-25-2004, 02:37 AM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sluttypatton
Remember that on turbocharged cars, blow off valves are not used to control boost levels, just vent the pressure that builds up at the throttle plate when it is closed, and prevent compressor surge. However, pop off valves are like radiator caps, they open when the pressure reaches a preset level, these can be used to control boost to the engine, as once the boost pressure reaches a certain level they will open and vent excess boost to the atmosphere.
So can pop off valves double as a blow off valve, controlling both boost pressure and excess pressure? Why would a supercharger need a pop-off valve anyway?

Isn't the boost already regulated by the engine RPMs so that x amount of boost will be made from x amount of RPMS?

I don't see a need for a blow off valve either, when you release the pedal, the engine starts trying to go idle speed, the super charger goes as fast as the engine will spin it, so if the engine goes to idle speed, won't the supercharger follow along?

A turbo, will keep spinning the compressor for a while after the gas pedal has been let off, this builds up pressure on the throttle plate, a blowoff/bypass valve releases this harmful excess pressure, this is why they have a BOV right?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-25-2004, 02:40 AM
Auto_newb Auto_newb is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Forced induction? Compression?

What other things could I do to stop detonation besides lowering compression, retard timing, and running rich?

BTW, this might help me, what is a crux? (checked the dictionary, too many meanings)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-25-2004, 03:05 AM
Sluttypatton's Avatar
Sluttypatton Sluttypatton is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A crux is a focal point, in this case crux means most important point.

Think of it this way, the motor slows down because the throttle plate closes, allowing less air to enter the combustion chamber. So the compressor is still producing boost until the throttle plate closes, and the moment the throttle plate has closed, the remaining pressurised air will not be able to exit the piping. Also remember that boost pressure created by a turbocharger is actually more related to exhaust volume and energy than RPM's, although there is a correlation between RPM's and exhaust. So when the throttle plate closes, although the engine may still be at high RPM, there is less fuel being burned (and less exhaust being produced as a result) so the turbocharger will not really produce more boost. The problem the blow off valve avoids is the already pressurised air trapped by the throttle plate.

As for the pop off valve issue, I was merely clairifying what SaabJohan said, I have no experience using them to control boost beyond what I have read, and very little experience with superchargers for that matter.
__________________
Beer tastes better upside down.
Last edited by Sluttypatton on 13-54-2098 at 25:75 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Engineering/ Technical > Forced Induction


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts