|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do u like and Competitor for it | |||
| Yes |
|
1 | 14.29% |
| No |
|
2 | 28.57% |
| Forty Nine Best Competitor |
|
3 | 42.86% |
| Other |
|
1 | 14.29% |
| Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The new Bel Air YUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what were GM engineers smoking when they made this but maybe a rival to the Ford Forty Nine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The Forty Nine Convertible and also if Gm calls that Retro maybe they need to look at there cars again
http://www.fordfans1.homestead.com/FORDFAN1.htnl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Old Mod
![]() Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: None
Posts: 1,525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
In person, I thought the Bel Air was attractive, if not a bit conservative. The Forty-Nine convertible is much better looking than the coupe was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
R.I.P. DAD 3/25/11
![]() |
Ford Forty Nine is way better looking than that Bel Air.
__________________
Why do banks charge you a "non-sufficient funds fee" on money they already know you don't have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Never Fear, Rich is here!
![]() |
I dont think its all that bad....
__________________
My Wheels 15' Kia Soul SX 2.0L 13' GMC 1500 P/U 5.3L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
They need to change the front end of the Bel Air. Longer nose, different grille & headlights.....
I agree that they could have done better, easily. Eric |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 386
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
"One great big festering neon distraction, I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied. Learn to swim." |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
My Website: Team C4 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
http://www.fordfans1.homestead.com/FORDFAN1.html |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Ford were stupid to bring the T-Bird back that way.
If they had any sense at all they would have btought it back as a real sports car in competition with the corvette. If they had of done that Ford could actually claim to build a sports car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
|
Quote:
__________________
2001 Camaro SS #2239 of 6332 1/4 mile time: 13.575 @ 105.55 mph, 60' time: 2.276 307.1 rwhp, 330.1 rwtq = 353.2 hp, 379.5 lb ft torque Options: SLP Front Grille w/ SS Center Logo, 17" ZR1 Chrome rims, 6 speed, Hurst Short Throw Shifter, Monsoon 500 Watt Sound System, T-tops, 1LE Performance Suspension Mods: Holley PS Air Filter, SLP Air Box Lid w/ Mr. Ed's pipe fix, SLP CAI, SLP Bellows, SLP LM, SLP Y-pipe, SLP 160 Thermo, SLP Temp Module, SLP STB, KBDD SFC |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|