|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Hi Folks,
I was wondering what people's views are on forced induction vs. naturally aspirated. I am currently building the 351 Cleveland 4V motor for my '78 Ford Fairmont (fox chassis machine) and am trying to decide what setup to use. Here is option #1: Run naturally aspirated motor which has projected output of ~450 hp and maybe a 150 hp shot of nitrous (strong bottom end), with a nice lumpy idle and long headers. Note: this projection for power output is not unreasonable, as the STOCK 351 cleveland 4V in the Boss 351 mustang made 330 hp (conservative) from factory, so with a hot roller cam, single plane intake, bigger carb, porting, and headers, it isn't unreasonable at all. Here is option #2: Run boosted version (10 psi) of above motor with lower compression pistons, milder cam more suitable for boost, and blow through carb or EFI system, most likely with a power output of ~550-600 hp. Curious to hear everyone's input, as either way this light machine will be fast but hardly anyone really turboes v-8's, especially rather rare muscle car ones like the 351 cleveland Thanks |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sidenotes
A sidenote,
I am hoping this car will go into the low 10's or high 9's if I run turboes, check this website http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...s/0401mm_fair/ I have a similar setup, the '78 is a very small 2-dr machine around 2700 lbs with V-8. Maybe 10's will be achievable all motor, sacrificing some streetability? Later |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
read the third post in this link:
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=201348 its an article about a turbo V8 Anyway forget all the all scholl guys and their NA dreams, your goal is maximum power and turbos are the way. BTW I bet the next post will be by redneck383 arguing that going turbo is cheating....Bring it on Matty
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
Turbo's are cheating? Nah, just another way to make more power. Remember, I want a particular turbo motor for my Z. Pfft... Owned.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
We are talking about turbo V8's here punk, not turbo 4 bangers. ![]()
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
Pfffft... I PWN3D J00! Please see Fig.1.... ![]()
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
Mmmkay........
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
hahhahahahaha..... asshole.... Nice one.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
![]() BTW don't you just hate it when people - other than us - hijack threads
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
Yeah... I hatttee people who do that... such buttheads.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler 1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Well I assume that you want to make this a full race-only car, so the obvious choice would be the setup that has the most power. If you intend on driving this car on the street however, than you might want to go with the most reliable set-up, naturally aspirated.
__________________
2000 Nissan Maxima SE, autotragic, sterling mist My Max: Getting smoked by boosted cars since 2004 2004 AF award winner: longest time period w/o posting an actual street racing story Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
Quote:
given equal displacement a turbo car will be more reliable and stretable than an NA car when you reach very high power levels for that given engine just as an example a stock turbo srt4 engine: getting 350Hp will be easy to make, will still run on pump gas and be reliable, on the other hand take the same engine and with whatever modifications you want make it have 350hp NA....it will be very expesive, very high strung, will run only on race fuel since you'll need at lest 13:1 compression
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Turbo or Naturally Aspirated?
I choose comedy option #5
__________________
^I am Bunta, and I approve this post.^ |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
For a muscle car theirs nothing like allmotor rawness......................but adding on a little turbo system just ups the odds
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
i got this from the STi forums.
"having n/a is like having endless lag" which is true even though we're talkin about small block v8's here. i mean sure you can get the small block to make 500-600hp n/a but what would happen if you add boost? so its like in other words "having n/a is like having endless lag" now how true is that? i 100% agree.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|