Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-07-2004, 07:30 AM   #1
lickyme_pp
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: APO
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
srt-4 it is

well, i asked your opinions and no one replied. i guess it is true what they say about jettas, they are shit. the new ones have all kinds of problems with them and aren't really all that fast. i'm going to go for the srt-4 so whenever i pull up to a jetta (or most any other car for that matter) i will speed away from them happily knowing that i paid only 20k for mine and can whoop ass even with a bone stock car. later.
lickyme_pp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2004, 03:56 PM   #2
1fastvw
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I never saw your post about opinions. As for Jettas being a piece of shit, I love mine. I haven't had any problems with mine. SRT-4's are fast stock, but that doesn't make them any better. The ride quality in a jetta is much better, not to mention the interior quality and the options you get with it. The srt-4 does have some really nice seats, but you still have to manually roll up the back windows. To each his own, but I wish you would roll up to me in a stock one, because I would straight spank that ass. Don't let the 1.8ts fool you. Slight modifcations and it can turn into a beast.
1fastvw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 01:43 PM   #3
tylerrules84
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: srt-4 it is

Quote:
Originally Posted by lickyme_pp
well, i asked your opinions and no one replied. i guess it is true what they say about jettas, they are shit. the new ones have all kinds of problems with them and aren't really all that fast. i'm going to go for the srt-4 so whenever i pull up to a jetta (or most any other car for that matter) i will speed away from them happily knowing that i paid only 20k for mine and can whoop ass even with a bone stock car. later.
Go for it big guy. An SRT-4 may be fast, but its still... a Neon. Still an american engineered bucket of crap. And I hope you wreck it into a pole, so there will be one less POS in my way on the road.

Have a wonderful day.
__________________
Driver Found.
tylerrules84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 04:54 PM   #4
ehsrifledude
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Brockton, Alabama
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: srt-4 it is

An American engineered bucket of crap??? Hmmm... All I hear about Jettas and most volkswagens is crap. In fact, reliability on an SRT-4 is a helluva lot more than a jetta. Between the two, I'd get the SRT-4.... But that's my opinion.
ehsrifledude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 05:22 PM   #5
lickyme_pp
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: APO
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/
haha! will you be telling your friends that a neon can whoop your jetta's ass any day of the week? i don't think so. you'll make sure that they know it's an srt-4. don't get me wrong, i love how the jettas look. they're just too damn slow!
lickyme_pp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 06:33 PM   #6
MioCLK
AF Enthusiast
 
MioCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: srt-4 it is

well, aren't Jettas Amigo-made tacos?
MioCLK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2004, 11:47 PM   #7
tylerrules84
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: srt-4 it is

booyah! i see you brought your little buddies to stick up for the pos Neon.
I wouldn't tell my friends an SRT-4 could whoop my Jetta's ass, because I don't have a Jetta. My point is not defending the Jetta, its simply to say that the SRT-4 is still a piece of crap.

If you want to say "hey it's cheap and fast" whoopty doo, i could get $7000 and build a 220hp 2400lb GTI without a turbo... even more power if i went with a turbo.

As for my saying that American cars are crap, I stand by that. Americans couldn't engineer their way out of a wet paper sack.
__________________
Driver Found.
tylerrules84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 05:46 AM   #8
Neutrino
Yaya Master
 
Neutrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
Re: Re: srt-4 it is

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerrules84
Go for it big guy. An SRT-4 may be fast, but its still... a Neon. Still an american engineered bucket of crap. And I hope you wreck it into a pole, so there will be one less POS in my way on the road.

Have a wonderful day.
the wreck joke was not funny or apropiate

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerrules84

As for my saying that American cars are crap, I stand by that. Americans couldn't engineer their way out of a wet paper sack.

really that is funny...you do realise though that by posting this you just used an american enginnered CPU right?
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Neutrino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 06:25 AM   #9
MioCLK
AF Enthusiast
 
MioCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: srt-4 it is

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerrules84
booyah! i see you brought your little buddies to stick up for the pos Neon.
I wouldn't tell my friends an SRT-4 could whoop my Jetta's ass, because I don't have a Jetta. My point is not defending the Jetta, its simply to say that the SRT-4 is still a piece of crap.

If you want to say "hey it's cheap and fast" whoopty doo, i could get $7000 and build a 220hp 2400lb GTI without a turbo... even more power if i went with a turbo.

As for my saying that American cars are crap, I stand by that. Americans couldn't engineer their way out of a wet paper sack.

Then would you mind telling us which car you drive?

Besides cheap and fast, the SRT-4 is also backed up by full factory warranty and being street legal, which the owner wouldn't have to worry about getting pulled over for stupud fixing ticket.

Oh, last thing, mind telling us your age?
MioCLK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 07:08 AM   #10
crayzayjay
CFA
 
crayzayjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: Re: srt-4 it is

Any juvenile crap and this thread is closed
crayzayjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 09:57 AM   #11
tylerrules84
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: srt-4 vs. jetta

Well I could tell you what I drive and how old I am... but what difference would it make? What difference especially does my age make? If you want to find some kind of background why not do a little search and find my other posts.

I could post solid, hard and fast evidence as to why the SRT-4 (read:Neon) is a piece of crap... but why? You'll say I'm full of it, and post meaningless drivel as to why I'm wrong, to which I will respond with more hard and fast evidence, and so on and so forth. You see, by posting pointless crap from the start, I eliminate the middleman. Which is where the thread was headed to start with (see the original post by "lickyme_pp" [and you want to know how old I am?])

Now, if anyone actually wants to know the facts, just say so and I'll be happy to make a meaningful post, otherwise I'll continue to just insult any person or post that tickles my fancy.
__________________
Driver Found.
tylerrules84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 10:10 AM   #12
crayzayjay
CFA
 
crayzayjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: srt-4 vs. jetta

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerrules84
I could post solid, hard and fast evidence as to why the SRT-4 (read:Neon) is a piece of crap... but why? You'll say I'm full of it, and post meaningless drivel as to why I'm wrong, to which I will respond with more hard and fast evidence, and so on and so forth. You see, by posting pointless crap from the start, I eliminate the middleman. Which is where the thread was headed to start with (see the original post by "lickyme_pp" [and you want to know how old I am?])
If you find it pointless to make meaningful posts, your stay on AF will itself be pointless and consequently short-lived. Entirely up to you. If you can back up your arguments, welcome aboard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerrules84
Now, if anyone actually wants to know the facts, just say so and I'll be happy to make a meaningful post, otherwise I'll continue to just insult any person or post that tickles my fancy.
Do it once and you're banned
crayzayjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 01:15 PM   #13
Polygon
The Red Baron
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alpine, Utah
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polygon Send a message via Skype™ to Polygon
tylerrules84:

Sorry to see that you're another biased, misled, fool. I think the reason you won't post any proof that the SRT-4 is crap is simply because you don't have any. I, however, have some to prove that it isn't. Head over to Sport Compact Car's website. They did a tour of the plant where the SRT-4 engine is built and they were VERY impressed with the build quality. You people that keep saying it is a just a Neon, you're fools, whatever helps you sleep at night. There is nothing wrong with the older Neons, they are economy cars, but they are reliable and can be made to go pretty damn quick. However; the SRT-4 shares only a little sheet metal and some interior bits with the Neon. Everything else is different. The SRT-4 is no more a Neon than the Evo is a Lancer. As for American engineering, once again, whatever helps you sleep at night. The computer you're using is mostly American engineered and built parts. Another great example is Garrett. They make the BEST turbos in the world.

Pull your head out of your butt and stop posting misinformation.

As for the original thread, I would take the SRT-4 over any Jetta. The Jetta just isn't that fast stock. They are good reliable cars, but they just aren't that quick.
Polygon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 03:14 PM   #14
tylerrules84
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 87
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: srt-4 vs. jetta

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polygon
tylerrules84:

Sorry to see that you're another biased, misled, fool. I think the reason you won't post any proof that the SRT-4 is crap is simply because you don't have any. I, however, have some to prove that it isn't. Head over to Sport Compact Car's website. They did a tour of the plant where the SRT-4 engine is built and they were VERY impressed with the build quality. You people that keep saying it is a just a Neon, you're fools, whatever helps you sleep at night. There is nothing wrong with the older Neons, they are economy cars, but they are reliable and can be made to go pretty damn quick. However; the SRT-4 shares only a little sheet metal and some interior bits with the Neon. Everything else is different. The SRT-4 is no more a Neon than the Evo is a Lancer. As for American engineering, once again, whatever helps you sleep at night. The computer you're using is mostly American engineered and built parts. Another great example is Garrett. They make the BEST turbos in the world.

Pull your head out of your butt and stop posting misinformation.

As for the original thread, I would take the SRT-4 over any Jetta. The Jetta just isn't that fast stock. They are good reliable cars, but they just aren't that quick.
Yeah actually I read that article in Sport Compact Car, it did look pretty good. To be honest, I was only being a jerk because of the original post. That guy was a prick, almost as much of one as me.
The SRT-4's are the same as many American sporty cars, cheap horsepower. The overall build quality (from many reports I read... if you really wanna see, i can get links but geez) simply isn't up to par. But they're good if you just want cheap power. Kinda like a go-cart hahah.
Jetta's are not that fast stock (at least not yet, wait for the Jetta version of the R32), and are not that great of cars in my opinion. However, all of these "problems" with them are not all to be believed. Many of the problems have had roots in rather stupid drivers and dealers. At least that is the case with many of the ones that I have come across.
As for the american engineering, i mean specifically automotive industry. DSM in particular is widely known for making faulty cheap products. While they have been making strides forward in recent years, I'd still be highly wary of their products.

Oh and by the way, Polygon called me a fool. You should really ban him for insulting me.
__________________
Driver Found.
tylerrules84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 03:30 PM   #15
Neutrino
Yaya Master
 
Neutrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
Re: Re: srt-4 vs. jetta

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerrules84
The SRT-4's are the same as many American sporty cars, cheap horsepower. The overall build quality (from many reports I read... if you really wanna see, i can get links but geez) simply isn't up to par.

Your point would come much better across if you would would actually post this evidence.
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Neutrino is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Im looking into buying a 2004 neon srt-4. Help? taylorj_92 2nd Gen 00-05 0 12-18-2010 03:18 PM
Scion TC vs. SRT-4 vs. STI vs Z28 rice(er) Street Racing 74 04-12-2006 10:48 PM
NEON SRT-4 vs CHARGER SRT-8 209 SRT Street Racing 43 02-01-2006 08:53 AM
04 srt-4 vs. 93 vr-4 vs. 99 mustang gt unicyclemidget11 Car Comparisons 11 03-05-2005 03:01 PM
mr2 vs srt-4 vs 2nd gen eclipse turbo youngvr4 MR2/MR-S 1 06-16-2004 08:34 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts