|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
is the rear suspension is a four or five link -- my car is in the trailer and I am not positive off the top of my head...
thanks
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Augusta, Georgia
Posts: 220
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
I think it has 4 trailing arms 2 on each side and then a watts link in the middle.
But not 100% sure.
__________________
-Cobra (A.K.A Tom D) Racer and Gamer Panoz GTRA (Mystery Chassis #) (Track Toy) 2001 BMW M5 (Road Toy) 2006 F250 (Car Hauler) 2002 Odyssey (Kid Hauler) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
Cool -- that validates my thought as well.
Now, trying to find the gearing of my WC car -- is proving a challenge in itself.
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: akron, Ohio
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
I think are wc cars are a panard bar since the link does not rotate like a true watts link. but I love the set up since I am a soild axle guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Morrisville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,039
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
rear end is 3.50
tranny gears/ratio are 1st 3.27 2nd 1.98 3rd 1.34 4th 1.00 5th .82
__________________
Eric H (in case you couldn't guess) GT-WC #22 (now #62 and Blue) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
where in the hell did you find that?
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Morrisville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,039
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
if i told you that my usefulness would come to an end and I'd just be another "guy" ;-D
__________________
Eric H (in case you couldn't guess) GT-WC #22 (now #62 and Blue) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Martinez, Georgia
Posts: 314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
I thought everyone knew the diff ratio is 3.50. What else would you like to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
Quote:
maybe not a clear request... this is what I was looking for: Transmission Gearing 1st 3.27 2nd 1.98 3rd 1.34 4th 1.00 5th .82 sorry to have strained the board....
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lake Ozark, Missouri
Posts: 57
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
FWIW, We have two WC cars. When runnig certian tracks we change to a 4.11 rear end. Our cars came to us with 3.89 rear ends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
Testing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Jefferson, Georgia
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
Heyguys, if you have a WC car you have 389 gear. If you have a school car you have a 350 gear. There were only 25 WC cars and 56 school cars that were built. There are many ways to tell which car you have. If you have a 25 gallon fuel tank, you have a school car. If you have a 35 gallon fuel tank, a WC car. If you need more information or have questions, email me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 839
Thanks: 8
Thanked 60 Times in 53 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
Quote:
__________________
Kel M Panoz GTRA #17 New Zealand |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Jefferson, Georgia
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Rear Suspension question on the GT-WC's
your wright it was a 32 gallion fuel cell not a 35 in a wc car all wc car had 4.6 corba ford school had 302 ford
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|