Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > BMW > 3 Series
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-02-2007, 03:50 PM   #1
Tomsriv
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why don't they make a 340?

I love the 99-05 3 series and I love V8s. The car looks like its big enough to hold a V8. Its a bummer that the Germans and Japanese never put V8s in any small cars. I would rather have a 250hp V8 than a 333hp straight 6 M3 motor. I guess I'll have to get a Mustang.
Tomsriv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:07 PM   #2
mike@af
Captain Over Engineer
 
mike@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 6,711
Thanks: 27
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to mike@af Send a message via AIM to mike@af Send a message via Yahoo to mike@af
Re: Why don't they make a 340?

Handling...

Quoted from my other post:

Quote:
Assuming you're using the M62B35 the power out put is about 230-240HP with about 230lb/ft of torque. The S50B30 puts out 286hp and 258lb/ft of torque; or if you have an S52B32, puts out 321 HP and 236lb/ft of torque. So that seems like a down grade in power if you ask me. Plus the S50 weighs about 140kg, and the M62B35 weighs about 220kg. So not only do you have an engine thats 80kg heavier it has less torque and horsepower.
The weight ratio on the E46 is about 55(F) to 45(R). So why would you want more weight in the front? They arent straight liners, they're made to handle.
__________________
-Mike
AF Director of Media / Photographer

[email protected] | AutomotiveForums.com | Flickr Gallery
mike@af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:23 PM   #3
alphalanos
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: clearwater, Florida
Posts: 2,654
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Why don't they make a 340?

You can have alot of fun in a car with good weight balance and moderate power.
__________________
96 EJ6. Future home of boosted B18C1.
alphalanos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2007, 11:54 PM   #4
DinanM3_S2
Scuderia Kimi
 
DinanM3_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Why don't they make a 340?

Well the E92 M3 (present generation 3-series) is going to get a light weight V8 similar to the V10 in the M5/M6, but it won't feel the same. It will be much lighter and higher revving at the expense of torque.

Why would you want a heavier weaker engine? Porsche doesn't use V8s in the 911 either. Smaller, higher revving or turbo engines are usually what you will find in cars that handle well.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC
Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC

"I collect walnuts"
-Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1
DinanM3_S2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 02:09 AM   #5
Tomsriv
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Why don't they make a 340?

Porsche did put a V8 in their 928 though. I would rather have a V8 because they run smoother. The torque comes on a lot smoother in a V8 and they just sound a whole lot better than any other engine. V10's sound terrible.
The main reason I would want a heavier less powerful engine is because its a lot easier to modify, and cheaper to build/buy a simple large engine than it is to modify a high tech small engine. Its an American philosophy but I would like to apply it to a BMW where you get great handling and braking, etc too. I'm glad to hear the current gen is getting a V8.
Tomsriv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 02:59 AM   #6
DinanM3_S2
Scuderia Kimi
 
DinanM3_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Why don't they make a 340?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsriv
Porsche did put a V8 in their 928 though. I would rather have a V8 because they run smoother. The torque comes on a lot smoother in a V8 and they just sound a whole lot better than any other engine. V10's sound terrible.
The main reason I would want a heavier less powerful engine is because its a lot easier to modify, and cheaper to build/buy a simple large engine than it is to modify a high tech small engine. Its an American philosophy but I would like to apply it to a BMW where you get great handling and braking, etc too. I'm glad to hear the current gen is getting a V8.
I understand what you are saying, but a big part of why BMWs handle so well is because of the weight distribution. A big V8 would ruin that in a E46. The car was really designed for an I6 (which I think is smoother then many of the V8 cars I've driven).

There have however been interesting swaps into the 3-series. An LS1 has found its way into BMWs before (with a fair amount of pain and suffering).

Who says V10s sound bad?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=d1pLdr_Bg8s
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC
Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC

"I collect walnuts"
-Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1
DinanM3_S2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 08:54 PM   #7
mike@af
Captain Over Engineer
 
mike@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 6,711
Thanks: 27
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to mike@af Send a message via AIM to mike@af Send a message via Yahoo to mike@af
Re: Why don't they make a 340?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsriv
Porsche did put a V8 in their 928 though.
It also had a rear transaxle to help cope with weight distribution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsriv
I would rather have a V8 because they run smoother. The torque comes on a lot smoother in a V8...
I've seen some pretty damn smooth torque curves on 6cyl's. V8 Torque is usually low end; with the BMW, specifically the M50, S52, and S54 that I've run in have the most torque after 60mph. Apply that factor to racing, quicker acceleration out of the turns, and down the back stretches.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsriv
...and they just sound a whole lot better than any other engine.
Thats personal preference and opinion, but have you heard an all out S54 race motor from BMW? PTG ran them in their M3 GTR's in Le Mans. Sure sounds a lot like the Panoz's Ford V8's.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsriv
The main reason I would want a heavier less powerful engine is because its a lot easier to modify, and cheaper to build/buy a simple large engine than it is to modify a high tech small engine.
Maybe if you're building an SBC or BBC. Thousands of parts are available for the BMW 6cylinder motors. Parts for the M62's are a little bit harder to come by.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsriv
Its an American philosophy but I would like to apply it to a BMW where you get great handling and braking, etc too.
Here's my philosophy: Eight for the straight, six for the twists.
__________________
-Mike
AF Director of Media / Photographer

[email protected] | AutomotiveForums.com | Flickr Gallery
mike@af is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > BMW > 3 Series

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts