-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee
Register FAQ Community
'88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-12-2004, 05:06 PM
4-Door Flunky 4-Door Flunky is offline
AF Premium User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 748
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

I met a man driving the new civic gas-electric hybrid. He told me he owned a 4G CRX HF. He told me the hybrid only gets 55 mpg, but his old CRX HF got 65 mpg.
Could a CRX HF really get 65 MPG? I've seen the car. No passenger's door mirror, 13-inch steelies...and he was skinny.
Any possible way he could have gotten what he claims? Please, someone who has had one, call bullshit on this!
Flunky
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2004, 05:16 PM
DjRomo DjRomo is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

wtf that dude must of been high and been talking shit
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2004, 05:22 PM
l2ice rocketz l2ice rocketz is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 336
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to l2ice rocketz
Yes.. in his dreams he could.
__________________
91' Civic LX 4G4D

May 1, 2004 9:20 PM
R.I.P.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2004, 05:45 PM
travagliante's Avatar
travagliante travagliante is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

It could get 65mpg, but thats with starting the car leaving it in neutral and having someone in a truck pull it.
lol
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2004, 06:32 PM
91civicDXdude's Avatar
91civicDXdude 91civicDXdude is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to 91civicDXdude
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

i've always gotten over 30mpg with every honda engine i've owned.. d16z6, b18a1, and these were modded and i dont drive like a grandma.. If he were to lug it around, i belive it could be possible
__________________
What makes you think you should be spoonfed?

http://4thgencivic0.tripod.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2004, 06:35 PM
travagliante's Avatar
travagliante travagliante is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

I guess youre prolly right on that, my mom drives my civic dohc zc like a women and can get like 38mpg. I drive like a bat out of hell and sometimes get up to 25mpg.
hehe oh well, i also need a new fuel filter.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2004, 10:26 PM
crxlvr's Avatar
crxlvr crxlvr is offline
Slowest Automatic Civic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,460
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to crxlvr
a very easy going driver on nothing but long distance drives, could maybe get that kinda number, id say 55mph tops without stopping.

believe it or not driving to SC in my crx i got just about 50mpg, DX 1.5L
__________________
Name: Scott

Stable Of Cars I have Owned:
1991 Honda CRX
1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
2003 Honda Accord
1998 Chrysler Concorde
2007 Honda Civic
1997 Toyota Camry
1995 Saturn SC2
1996 Ford Taurus
1991 GMC Sierra
2002 Daewoo Leganza
1999 Dodge Ram
2007 Honda CR-V
2003 BMW 325i
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2004, 02:13 AM
riceriderjade's Avatar
riceriderjade riceriderjade is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 344
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

that makes me think about modding a car for better MPG than for speed or handling
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2004, 03:09 AM
vesper's Avatar
vesper vesper is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to vesper
Re: Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by travagliante
It could get 65mpg, but thats with starting the car leaving it in neutral and having someone in a truck pull it.
lol
LOL thats gotta be the funnyest thing i have seen on a thread. i smell bullshit. this guy has lied to you, as to many others...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2004, 07:31 AM
sastanley's Avatar
sastanley sastanley is offline
AF Premium User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to sastanley Send a message via Yahoo to sastanley
Thumbs up

I don't think this is bullshit at all.

I personally have gotten 40.34 MPG out of my DX sedan, with three people in it, loaded full of luggage for a vacation to go skiing. Oh, yeah, WITH a ski rack on top. Now granted, the car had 75K miles on it, and was only 4 years old at the time. I also took the time to have it aligned, balanced, and I change the oil every 5,000 miles with synthetic., so the car was about as efficient as it could get. I have been driving the car a little more aggressively in the last few years, and it is starting to burn a little oil now, but I still get low 30's (31-33 depending on if the oil compaines are fucking with the gas and oxygenating it in the winter) even now with 219K miles, and daily short-distance commuting.

No, you can't stomp on it up the hills, at every traffic light, or drive like you're playing NASCAR on the PS/2, and on the back sides of hills you pop it out of gear and coast...but I would say it is definitely possible..Remember, the HF only weighs 1800 lbs, my car weighs about 2260, and with the people and gear, I'd guess I added 400 lbs. A skinny dude commuting in an 1800 lbs. HF, definitely possible. Other factors, some mentioned above that can affect MPG:
I think the HF also had 165/13 tires, & all you dudes with fatty 205 or 215 width tires are laying about 45% more contact patch = more rolling resistance = more drag.
I think the HF only has one mirror (stock), which is like you sticking your arm out the window all the time. It isn't much, but think about on a long stretch of highway if we could fold in those mirrors knowing there was no one behind us..it makes a difference.
The tall gearing of the HF allows the car to cruise at 65MPH at about 1900 RPM. Since the motor is only pulling 1950 lbs. down the road, it doesn't need to spin at 3000+ RPM, therefore the engine is running nice and slow and efficient.

So I think it was definitely a possibility. Dude probably didn't get 65mpg ALL the time, but I am sure sometimes he did. Some tanks, I only get 28-29, if I use the A/C a lot, or I am hauling stuff - more recently I towed 1100lbs. worth of boat and gear 365 miles with 3 people in the car, and STILL got 27 MPG. My buddy drove his Suburban with an identical boat, and didn't see his fuel efficiency change at all..he still gets 12-13 mpg regardless - But I remember him spending about $35 at every gas station, and I spent about $13. I had a lot more leftover for beer money.
All you haters can't underestimate the mighty D-series!!!
__________________
-Shawn
'91 Civic DX sedan
DOHC ZC, I,H,E, urethane bushings and mount inserts, rock chipped hood, some rust, stock steelies, nice comfy Integra seats, and the A/C works! What else could you want from an 18 year old car with 241,000 miles? Working on getting the Si tranny in now
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-13-2004, 08:31 AM
nemo_wolf's Avatar
nemo_wolf nemo_wolf is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to nemo_wolf Send a message via MSN to nemo_wolf Send a message via Yahoo to nemo_wolf
Re: Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by riceriderjade
that makes me think about modding a car for better MPG than for speed or handling

you just might start the next craze ... and i might just jump on that band wagon.
__________________
AF Bay Area Crew
91 civic LX sedan : Dec. 3rd 01 - Dec. 9th 02
88 civic DX hatch : Jan 14th 03 - Oct 05
96 Zamboni Model 552 : done working there
00 Civic EX coupe : Oct 05 - Sept 2010
11 Scion xB : Sept 2010 - Present
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-14-2004, 02:01 AM
bbrianr bbrianr is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I get 45-50MPG out of my 88 HF. I commuted from LA to Central CA every weekend and the gas was killing me.
I bought my REX and had to go through the tranny in the first week. Engine had about 200K and warped a head. I completely went through the stock engine and got all tuned nicely. It passed CA Smog with less than 12 H/C(122 H/C's alloed) and measured 0.00% Carbonmonoxide on the dynosmog.

Keep the car light and stay under 65mph then 50-55MPG is totally possible. The engine is low on H/P but has just about the same torque as a SI. Torque takes you off the line and keeps you running from stoplight to stoplight. But when I put the tranny in 5th gear on the freeway and the RPM are below 2K, I am cruising.

I know with a little tuning and refining, it is completely possible to get around 60MPG.
I did notice a big drop in MPG when I put in my 8pt full cage. I added over 150lbs of tubing and reinforcement plates to the interior. Now I am getting 42-48 MPG.

Just my $0.02

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-14-2004, 02:14 PM
doug294 doug294 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to doug294
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Could you put a HF final drive in a Si tranny. That would be a awsome race/highway setup.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-15-2004, 12:33 AM
riceriderjade's Avatar
riceriderjade riceriderjade is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 344
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nemo_wolf
you just might start the next craze ... and i might just jump on that band wagon.

hhaha, i'm serious, take a crx, tune it to be incredibly fuel efficent
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-15-2004, 02:01 AM
alexdog69's Avatar
alexdog69 alexdog69 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Here are some >60mpg testimonials there are others... but you get the idea...

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=CR...ass.edu&rnum=3

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=CR...hp.com&rnum=25

i also read some post by this lunatic on usenet awhile back...who had a CRX HF...however, he had performed some tweaks..and was making even more ridiculous claims about mileage...perhaps it was 80mpg or so...but he had changed the tires to something taller and perhaps even narrower(if possible?) to make the gearing even taller and reduce rolling resistance .. and he had a special driving technique ... from what he was saying, his modified HF and methods for driving definately made for a miser's dream come true... however, i dont remember the specific mods he did....

during the gas crisis there were lots of modders doing high fuel efficiency project cars based on air cooled vw's... there was even a kit to convert it to 2 cylinder....

so...some people like tweaking for mpg...
including honda crx (hf) engineers
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts