|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
General Fiero Questions
My Friends and I are building a Fiero GT for the 12Hours Lemons Race and I wanted to check here to see what are the immediate concerns and problematic issues with these cars?
Im a member to the board and live religiously over in the Panoz section as this is my daily race car but we are getting the Fiero for a "fun-project" car to run in the Lemons Series. Any help or input you owners can supply, would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Nothing scares me anymore
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: City of Light
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
|
Re: General Fiero Questions
The '88 model has far-superior factory suspension than the 84-87 models. It is much better handling and more adjustable.
Unfortunately, this is common knowledge, so '88 prices seem to be somewhat higher. If rules allow, consider using a 4 cylinder Fiero and swapping-in a GM marine block 3 liter engine. It is externally identical to the 2.5, but much stronger and more powerful. I have a marine block 3 liter 4 cyl in my boat. (It's an OMC, not a Mercruiser) It's rated at 140 hp (50 more than the 4 cyl Fiero) with just a 1bbl carb! It can also run at WOT, 4500 rpm (hp peak) all day with no problems. As I recall, there are numerous hop-up components available for the 3 liter marine block, too, to give you 200+ hp reliably. I have built a 2.8 V6...... and I think it will be less reliable for 12 hours than the marine block 3 liter. The 2.8 design is somewhat limited by short intake runners and bearing oiling problems at sustained high revs. I modded mine (Edelbrock cam, 4bbl intake, shorty headers, .080 overbore, Fiero heads) and it has about 150-160 hp .... I burned up the #1 piston after some heavy towing. I fixed it, but have been more gentle since. It's been reliable, but I have not thumped it. Personally, I think that GM did not make a marine variant of the 2.8 because it is not very durable for severe use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF -Advisor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: General Fiero Questions
Regarding the similarities between the 2.5 and 3.0. Very little. Nothing interchanges. 3.0 is "based" on the old 153 CID 4-cylinder used in early Chevy II and Nova. It will not "fit" in Fiero without serious modifications. Trans flange is different, as are all the mounting points. Great engine, though!
There is a plethora of high performance parts readily available for the "Iron Duke" 2.5 (metric, not based on 153). Pontiac campaigned Fieros in the late '80s with success, using their "Super Duty" engine program. All the "goodies" are in the GM Performance catelog. The head is a work of art! We've built 2.5s for midgets that make over 325 HP, naturally aspirated. And they rev 8,000 all afternoon...(:- Callie's makes a crank (billet steel, rather expensive) that "strokes" it to 2.8 lr. Concerning the V6, as with any other production design, there are inherent defficencies when it comes to high speed durability. The 3.1 block is much stronger than the 2.8, with ribs cast into it all around. A "FWD" block will bolt right into the Fiero. If you have a displacement "rule", not to worry, the 2.8 crank will also bolt right in. The pistons are the same bore size but have different pin placement. The later ('90-up) oil pump is far superior to the older design, too. The biggest issue with Fiero under racing conditions is the oiling system. The stock pans are 1 qt. "smaller" than the other GM cars using the same engine. This is due to limited space under the engine. Making a "special" pan with a "floating" pickup is the hot lick. One can add space in various areas to increase capacity and control "slosh" in cornering. As stated, the '88 is the "good" one. My '88 GT will STOMP my '86 in the corners ("dead heat" in a drag race). It (the '88) actually drives like a REAL sports car. A well-built 3.1 in this car will make it run on a par with the Nissan 300ZX (non-turbo, of course), Mitsi 3000GT (again, non-turbo), and Toyota Supra. I know this to be true, as I have actually DONE it, not just "saw one". My '86 SE went into the 15s and would top out well over 120. Made more than one Jap "sports car" angry...(:- I would imagine, putting a small turbo on the 3.1 would make it a BEAST! One of our next projects is an '86 SE 4-peed car. We're "doing" a 3.4 twin-cam for it, for drag racing. Should be interesting... The numbers show 400 HP possible without a blower. HE HE HE... Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Nothing scares me anymore
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: City of Light
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
|
Re: General Fiero Questions
^^ Good advice,... those options make me wish I kept my '84 SE.
![]() imo any of those suggested mods would end up with a car that's way too nice to thrash in the Lemons race... ..... which actually leads me to my next question. I recall there is a strict spending limit in this race, which may rule out some of the mods. What is the spending limit you can work with? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: General Fiero Questions
Quote:
__________________
Devin - (aka Panoz26) Formally WC Car # 26, Red Now = WC-GT2 # 211, Black |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|