|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
03-03-2003, 11:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Zonda S vs. Murcielago vs. Enzo vs. Mclaren F1
In a race from a stand still to 200mph, who would take it?
Also, which is everyones favorite?
__________________
 1986 Toyota Corolla GTS Coupe 1986 Toyota Corolla SR5 Hatch (Project 20V) 
|
|
#2
03-04-2003, 02:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
on a straight line probably the zonda or the F1 maybe barely edging the enzo.
But that is a bad comparison that is not what those cars were built for. They are built for the track not straigh line. On a track my money is on the enzo. Btw to make a sugestion to any mod...Post a Poll.
__________________
 (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
|
|
#3
03-04-2003, 09:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
ENZO has alot of years over the F1. the Zonda is not really a super car super car. its a small private guy who designs cars who happans to be able to survive by making super cars when most small companies like that fail. if it comes to speed on a track, the ENZO would win hands down because its more balanced, and makes a SHIT load of downforce. if it comes to looks the Zonda blows them both away.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX  Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
#4
03-04-2003, 07:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Zonda...ugly IMHO
F1...eh...it's played out and everyone and their mom has wanted one...I want something else...and fresh Enzo...SUPERUGLY...that's a fact! Murciélago...nice looking, fast still, and fresh... 
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel 
|
|
#5
03-04-2003, 11:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
heh nissanspdr. that means the Zonda looks the best out of all of 3 choices, because its just ugly, the other is played out, and the other is super ugly. hehe i know the ENZO is ugly, but its looks is pure function. thats why i love it.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
#6
03-05-2003, 09:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
But I chose the Murciélago based on the fact that I think it looks the best out of the 4 and other reasons posted above, TatII
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel
|
|
#8
03-05-2003, 05:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i would say the ENZO mostly because it is the top in techonology followed closely by the murcielago.
as for looks the zonda scares me now the mclaren is WAY out played everyone thinks its the best and its not the murcielago is beautiful and amazing the enzo just hits a soft spot
__________________
Who’d dare build a car without doors or side windows or a hood? Only Lotus. And who’d dare drive one? You would. The 340R is the sports car for people who live to drive and want the whole experience as raw and as pure as it comes.
|
|
#9
03-05-2003, 06:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
i changed my mind...
as for looks i like the Zonda ROADSTER i just saw it..its breathtaking
__________________
Who’d dare build a car without doors or side windows or a hood? Only Lotus. And who’d dare drive one? You would. The 340R is the sports car for people who live to drive and want the whole experience as raw and as pure as it comes.
|
|
#10
03-05-2003, 06:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
