|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
05-25-2004, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
celica Vs RSX
hey does anyone know if a celica st with a few mods 130Hp
would beat a stock rsx, 160 hp (i think) the celica is about 3-400 pounds lighter 
|
|
#2
05-25-2004, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
oh its not an S type
|
|
#3
05-25-2004, 05:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
no, it would lose pretty badly.
__________________
SR20 powered SE-R: 60mph-6.2 sec., 1/4mi.-14.7 sec. VG30 powered Maxima SE: 60mph-7.8, 1/4mi.-15.8 sec.  Don't make me ANGRY Or I will kick you in teh NUTS Your NUTS will feel teh steel toe Teh steel toe that has been in teh snow I will rip off yuor pants and kick yuo in teh nuts My steel toe will stick to yuor nuts And I will swing yuo around by yuor nuts as I do a Hurricane kick
|
|
#5
05-27-2004, 11:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
oh, u know what an st runs stock, what about a gt, and gt-s?
|
|
#6
05-27-2004, 01:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
Well, first of all, a 1991 Celica ST has 103hp. Not 130.
Now, the Celica All-trac Turbo model is making 200hp and has AWD but it runs a 15.7 in the quarter JUST like an RSX base model. The Celica GT and GT-S are the ones with 130hp. The GT runs a high 17 in the quarter while the GT-S runs about a 17.6. So I'm guessing that the Celica ST runs mid-18's. That would definitely get spanked(and spanked hard), by a base RSX by at least 10-15 car lengths at the quarter mile mark.
__________________
SR20 powered SE-R: 60mph-6.2 sec., 1/4mi.-14.7 sec. VG30 powered Maxima SE: 60mph-7.8, 1/4mi.-15.8 sec. Don't make me ANGRY Or I will kick you in teh NUTS Your NUTS will feel teh steel toe Teh steel toe that has been in teh snow I will rip off yuor pants and kick yuo in teh nuts My steel toe will stick to yuor nuts And I will swing yuo around by yuor nuts as I do a Hurricane kick
|
|
#7
05-29-2004, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
what about those all-trac celica's.The 4wd turbo models, i kno they are rare but anybody got any numbers on those babies?
|
|
#8
05-29-2004, 04:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
I just told you what they are
200hp 205tq 1/4 mi. = 15.7 seconds.
__________________
SR20 powered SE-R: 60mph-6.2 sec., 1/4mi.-14.7 sec. VG30 powered Maxima SE: 60mph-7.8, 1/4mi.-15.8 sec. Don't make me ANGRY Or I will kick you in teh NUTS Your NUTS will feel teh steel toe Teh steel toe that has been in teh snow I will rip off yuor pants and kick yuo in teh nuts My steel toe will stick to yuor nuts And I will swing yuo around by yuor nuts as I do a Hurricane kick
|
|
#9
08-18-2004, 11:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
actually ur wrong,
st runs 16.9-17.1 Depending on conditions Gt and gts have same engine and run low 16's 16.2-16.8 and all tracks runs a low 15 15.2-15.5
|
|
#10
08-20-2004, 02:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
1990 Toyota Celica GT-S 17.6
1991 Toyota Celica GT Conv. 17.1 1994 Toyota Celica GT 16.4 1994 Toyota Celica GT Coupe 16.4
__________________
Sponsorship: Amateur Motorsports <-- Get the book! - books are now available for shipment
|
|
#11
08-20-2004, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
hey jekyle u got that off this website didnt you, http://www.supras.co.uk/performance/cartimes.htm
or some spawn or copy of it....yeah look at the mr2 numbers, or any other car, that website sucks....ive been to tracks now and seen gts, gt, sand ran my st.....the only one i havnt seen is a all trac but it soulb b about the same as mr2 turbo and ive seen those run (mr2 is rear wheel dirve but have mid engine, making weight distribution 50/50... i know u know hyde but for peopel that dont)
|
|
#12
08-20-2004, 04:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
1990 Toyota Celica GT-S 17.6
1991 Toyota Celica GT Conv. 17.1 1994 Toyota Celica GT 16.4 1994 Toyota Celica GT Coupe 16.4 also funny how gt and gts have the EXACT same engine and gts is 100 pounds heavyer yet the runs 1.2 seconds faster, goes to show you how right that website is (yeah diff generations but same engine and tranny)
|
|
#13
08-20-2004, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
oh n btw i beat the rsx, not by much, the front of his car was at my back tires.... goes to show you that a car thats 15 years younger and is toyota can still take a honda
|
|
#14
08-20-2004, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
n btw i said 130 hp cuase tahts what id guess i have now, its probably more like 140-145 but im not over zelous
|
|
#15
08-20-2004, 08:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: celica Vs RSX
91 Celica St , that is not the site I got it from.
Regardless, that sites's figures for the MR2 are accurate.
__________________
Sponsorship: Amateur Motorsports <-- Get the book! - books are now available for shipment
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
