Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > General Discussion
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2006, 09:55 AM   #1
jveik
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
350 engine help...

im building a powerful 350 for my 5000 pound truck and need a lot of torque, a combination costing about 2500 to 3000 bucks will get me about 416 ponies and 423 lb/ft of torqe, the only problem is that its a truck, so i need more low end torque, since the 423 is reached at 4000 rpm, not a good place for a heavy vehicle. they claim in the article that switching from the comp cams 268 Xtreme Engergy cam to the smaller 262 version would improve low end torque at a slight loss of power over 4500 rpm...

do any of you guys have any idea as to how much of a gain i could expect from using the smaller cam in the torque arena?
jveik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 12:55 PM   #2
Mines69Olds
AF Regular
 
Mines69Olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 428
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mines69Olds
Re: 350 engine help...

There may not even be a gain of HP by using a "smaller" cam. It just may utilize the torque at a lower RPM. You may even drop some HP but get a wicked torque band from 1000-3500 RPM. But you may also want to look into advancing the cam too. If you keep the same cam but advance the time about 6 degrees you may actually build torque at lower RPM but top end wouldn't be so amazing anymore. So advancing 6 degrees BTDC may get you 435ft/lbs at 3300. I believe Car Craft magazine had an article on Cam Power, but I can't seem to find it. If you need any other information just ask.
-Matt-
__________________
1969 Olds Cutlass
1985 Olds Cutlass
2000 Ford Ranger
2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport
Mines69Olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 09:42 PM   #3
abaird
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 456
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 350 engine help...

Raise your compression. You will need to run higher octane gas but it will be worth it.
__________________
2009 Silverado 1500
2002 Camaro Z28(rebuilder)
2005 Yamaha GP1300R
abaird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 11:58 PM   #4
jveik
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 956
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 350 engine help...

yeah ive been looking around and i figure the cast iron shortblock prolly cant safely rev up to 5700 rpm without flying apart, which is where the power from the 268 maxes out... i bet the smaller one would do quite well, although i dont know if i would need the 750 cfm carb at that point lol...
jveik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 09:41 AM   #5
Mines69Olds
AF Regular
 
Mines69Olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 428
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Mines69Olds
Re: 350 engine help...

Just get one and if you don't like the performance save some money and time. Then put the other one in or shop around for a cam that you can see really works with your application. There is no problem with going cheaper now and finding something better later on. I'd rather do that then spend money now and not be satisfied.
__________________
1969 Olds Cutlass
1985 Olds Cutlass
2000 Ford Ranger
2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport
Mines69Olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2006, 05:27 AM   #6
TLBLZER
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Englewood, Tennessee
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 350 engine help...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jveik
im building a powerful 350 for my 5000 pound truck and need a lot of torque, a combination costing about 2500 to 3000 bucks will get me about 416 ponies and 423 lb/ft of torqe, the only problem is that its a truck, so i need more low end torque, since the 423 is reached at 4000 rpm, not a good place for a heavy vehicle. they claim in the article that switching from the comp cams 268 Xtreme Engergy cam to the smaller 262 version would improve low end torque at a slight loss of power over 4500 rpm...

do any of you guys have any idea as to how much of a gain i could expect from using the smaller cam in the torque arena?
Try a 383 stroker engine.Get you 400 small block crank shaft and then build with 30 over bore
decent heads always a plus .Try ultradane cams they ground you a cam shaft for your needs .That should give a very torky and quick rived machine
TLBLZER is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > General Discussion


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts