|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
which?
Which is faster supra or camaro on the norm?
Whats a camaro comparable to on the streets performance wise? -Pete |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which?
Which Camaro and Which supra? A 1986 six cylinder camaro probably wouldn't keep up to a cavalier. But a LT1 powered 4th gen would give most supras a good run...
__________________
1994 3.4L Chevrolet Camaro - No more 2006 Hyundai Sonata |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd say a Camaro is faster than a supra, but ofcourse it all depends on what mods have been done to the car.
A 93-02 Camaro can be compared to a 93-02 Firebird ![]() On a serious note, the 93-02 Camaros are as fast, if not faster than new the new Mustangs.
__________________
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which?
I'd like to see what the supra forum is saying about us.. brb
*added V8 Supra thread(2003) occasionally you get the country rivalry like "American V8's suck" but on the whole the AF members are open minded and share some good information. Don't mean to hijack the thread but it was inevitable anyway. If you want to know what's faster, they're right, it varies from car to car. seeing you already have a 95 camaro, are you asking about a race? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: which?
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: which?
Quote:
__________________
1994 3.4L Chevrolet Camaro - No more 2006 Hyundai Sonata |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: which?
Quote:
__________________
'92 RS lt1/t56, lt4 hot cam, 30lb injectors, 54mm throttle body, full exhaust, 4.11 posi, 4 coil ignition, alluminum driveshaft, adj rear suspension, low. springs, electric water pump, custom tune. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which?
I was going to say... my maro would hand most cars their ass in heartbeat, but.... I gotta get the engine & trans fixed.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: which?
It really depends on what year supra and camaro you are comparing. The 93-98 Twin Turbo Supras are no joke. In stock trim the fair pretty got damn good, which is why the car is so overrated. They responds to mods so freakin well, it's rediculous. Supra TT's stock would beat a stock LT1 powered 4th gen, not sure about LS1 powereed 4th gen. But then again, in the streets, numbers mean nothing. Anything can happen. A corolla can beat a ferrari... LOL!!!
__________________
87 IROC - R.I.P, and she will never be forgotten ![]() 90 RS - The beginning of a new era... I hope. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: which?
Quote:
You're on.
__________________
![]() -2000 LS1 Z28-1979 Berlinetta*sold*-1992 RS 25th Anniv. 350*sold*- |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: which?
Quote:
__________________
1994 3.4L Chevrolet Camaro - No more 2006 Hyundai Sonata |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: which?
Quote:
You hitting on me SG??? (Don't stop )
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which?
LS1 car > TT Supra
LT1 car = TT Supra At least stock for stock. The big thing about the Supra's is what they can take for power on the stock bottom end. They can make close to 1000 HP on the stock bottom end. At least the newer ones....The ones with the 2JZ. The N/A Supra's aren't dogs either, but are slower with no boost.
__________________
1999 Pontiac Trans Am WS.6 #1747 Stock'ish' |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: which?
Quote:
__________________
![]() -2000 LS1 Z28-1979 Berlinetta*sold*-1992 RS 25th Anniv. 350*sold*- |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which?
get a room. for sg's sake hopefully its one without earl.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|