|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Engineering/ Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
forgotten muscle
Thinking outside the square and going beyond familiar cars like the Boss 429s, Super Bees etc. there are probably some hot rides that get overlooked or have been forgotten. Maybe some models from the 50s, or ones from the smog era that could be quick once the pollution controls are dumped?
401-XR Gremlin 455 HO Grand Prix |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
hmmm...
Dodge Lil Red Express Truck, not muscle but just about the quickest vehicle in its time late sixties pontiac grand prix buicks of all kinds
__________________
Move along, there is nothing to see here... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would say the 1974 Camaro Z/28 is a pretty decent car. Not as quick as its predecessors, but still cool. Also the original 1966 385 bhp Toronado is a hot choice for those that like front drivers.
Toronado
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
Studebaker Gran Turismo w/R-4 (supercharged) 289
Pontiac Catalina 421SD Olds Starfire Ford 500XL 7 Liter Pontiac 2+2 Ford Thunderbolt ( Fairlane body, 427) '70 Riviera Grand Sport Rambler Rebel Machine (not very fast, but unusual!) Jensen Interceptor That funny looking Plymouth Fury (with the white body, gold stripes, wing, etc., late '60s) Sunbeam Tiger The list can go on and on... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
^^good list^^
Lots of the 60's and early 70's luxury cars had decent engines......and especially when the personal luxury market got rolling, there were some decent performers, especially with a few mods. They are also MUCH cheaper than real muscle cars. As mentioned the Grand Prix, Rivieras, T-Birds (429 engine) Monte Carlos, big mopars of all kinds, Mercury Maurader, big block Galaxies, etc. The best approach is to choose the right chassis, one that's not too heavy. For example the pre-67 and post '71 T-Birds were rediculously heavy, as were many of the big Mercurys. Also make sure you get the biggest engine. For example, the big Buicks and Ford engines may not be too popular with performance engine builders, but all could be made to really perform. Alternatly, really strange lighter cars could really go. There were a lots of 304 powered AMC Gremlins and Hornets. Sure its a bit of a waste to build a 304, but a 390/401 drops in easily. A few rare Hornet SC 360's were made. Those things would turn 13 flat in the quarter with headers, a decent tune up and proper tires. Finally, I like the small block Chevy Monza......it looks like a Camaro that shrunk in the wash....but has huge potential and is cheap. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Replacing the 304 with the 401 is a common swap, that engine had great torque. In a small car you wouldn't miss the horsepower shortfall. The GM H body (Monza) is most likely the smallest car to come with the Chevy sb.
74' AMX 401 SD 455 T/A |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
what about the Vega? it could be made to perform with an engine swap i mean comon isnt that sick?http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/348572. There were a couple Road Runner models like the 73/74 and 76-80 volare version whihc had potential. Another Mopar that i havent really seen much of is the Furys which alos had some balls. ill look more later
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, V8 Vega conversion kits were popular back in the day. Vega was a good looking car so it was cool that it got the power to match the Camaro style looks.
You could drop a worked 360 or 400 into those 76-80 Volare Road Runners, Aspen R/Ts and have a hot ride for sure. Plus the small size made for easy parking. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
what about the AMC Hurst SC/rambler ! ! ! this was the fastest AMC car ever made. low 14s from factory and with a few simple bolt ons they would run low 12s ! ! !
http://www.musclecarcalendar.com/MyG...amblerHome.htm click here also to see painting, http://www.dannywhitfield.com/scrambler.html thanks,matt FREEDOM=AMC |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
Matt,
You're right! I have no idea how I could have forgotten the Scrambler. Got suckered by one one night while out "playin'". It was extensively modified (much faster than stock), and had a primer grey paint job. I didn't see the headrests until the race was over (red, white and blue...). He got me by a couple lengths through third. Hate it when that happened... Jim |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: forgotten muscle
Quote:
what were you driving ? those SC/ramblers hurt alot of feelings. i am glad my post made you remember , that is the fun to me to get the car out in front of people so they can see that the little dog could take a bite out of the big dog every now and then. thanks, matt |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
In 1984 I had a 1970 Gremlin X with a 5.0 Liter V8. 3 Speed on the floor with a 3.90 posi rear end. All factory stock. king of ugly, but a fun car.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: forgotten muscle
Quote:
Thats not entirely true, they had a gremlin with a factory 401 that ran 13s. It was a factory order option, even came with wheelie bars. Not many were made though.
__________________
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: forgotten muscle
I forgot......some of the Chevy Monza sister cars from the 70's, Olds Firenza, Buick Skylark and Pontiac.....something...........could be had with a small block Chevy.
The Buicks often came with 3.8 v6's.......... a Regal T-Type/ Grand National turbo engine might just drop in. You could certainly win a few races with that combination. Finally, I seem to recall a build-up Hot Rod magazine did a few years ago involving a Chevette and a 500 cid Caddy motor. It was rediculous,ugly and lethally fast, but probably some fun though. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also the AMC S/C 360 Hornet, that was a neat little car.
A rare H nody was the 1977 Chevy Monza Mirage, only 4097 made.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|