|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
If mach 1's only have 305hp and Camaro SSs have over anywhere from 325-350hp wouldnt the SS win. Who would win?
Last edited by JohnC24; 10-11-2004 at 10:55 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
you have already asked this. i will actually answer this time in hope that you will stop asking these types of questions. welcome to the forum BTW.
both cars are considered mid to low 13 second cars. this means that in most cases it will be a drivers race between these two cars. from a stop, the mach will get the jump, but the ss should catch it in the end. from a roll the mach can forget about it. there you go, bye bye
__________________
Co-Founder of AF V-Card Club 1999 Ford Mustang Cobra: Cobra R rims, Magnaflow CB. "no way man...i saw an LS1 fight godzilla and the LS1 beat godzilla and it looked in the air and was like what do you think of that god and god was like bring it bitch so they fought and the LS1 beat god now the LS1 is god because its the greatest thing ever." |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
more like high 13 second cars unless theyre on drag radials. or modded of coarse
__________________
1992 Camaro RS 305 Throttle Body Injection, T5 5 speed transmission Flowmaster Exhaust, Performance TBI Chip, Open Element Air Cleaner Two 10" Boston Generators power by a 760watt Pioneer Amplifier Currently building a 383 stroker motor Before Swap: RS = Really Slow After Swap: RS = Ridiculous Speed |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
Quote:
i have read in magazines that they should be high 13 second cars as well. then again, i have heard/seen slips of them running 13.3s (street tires) or so. unless people are liars now a days. i dunno.
__________________
Co-Founder of AF V-Card Club 1999 Ford Mustang Cobra: Cobra R rims, Magnaflow CB. "no way man...i saw an LS1 fight godzilla and the LS1 beat godzilla and it looked in the air and was like what do you think of that god and god was like bring it bitch so they fought and the LS1 beat god now the LS1 is god because its the greatest thing ever." |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
new machs have hit low 13s i'm positive...However between the two from a dead it would all depend on driver as has already been said but froma roll the mustang looses all it's advantage and the top end the LS1 has will lead it to victory.
William
__________________
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
Who gives a fuck you guys ask this fucken question atleast once a day stop fucking asking the same stupid question
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
People that cry about people talking about the same thing on an internet message board...need to get a life and find something better to do...
__________________
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
I agree with Smokey. Do a search.
__________________
97 Camaro - 2.077 60', 14.745 @ 92.20 - still down, one year later. 194k miles-160* thermo-V8 shocks/springs (V6 rear springs)-3" Magnaflow !cat (3" dynomax bullet) back-SLP CAI-stock boxed LCAs-poly tranny mount and torque arm bushing-custom HPTuners tuning-4.10s/eaton/TA girdle-3.5" alum DS-spohn LCA brackets-prostar skinnies 179.75 RWHP, 204.52 RWTQ ON ITS WAY: MORE R.I.P. Andy 87 Benz 190e - DD 01 EX250 - still gotta get my license for this thing |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
I wasn't asking which is faster, all i was saying is my opinion on it, as for smokey818 i wasn't necessarily saying you but i noticed it all over this board, people tend to wine about doing a search instead of just answering. The time it takes to tell someone to do a search you could just answer their question...Be an internet tough guy somewhere else...Maybe he should have done a search but either way it got answered...
__________________
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
According to CarandDriver's most recent test of a 2003 Mach1, it did a 14.0 second quarter mile. When the tested the SS in 2001, they had it around 13.5 seconds. I say go by those figures. I know it's a driver's race, but if you want a reliable source, I say look at a popular car magazine.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
I've seen mach 1's run high 13's and I have yet to see them run in low 13's, my 01 mustang gt will only run a 14.02 1/4 and this is because I have bassani x-pipe, flowmaster exhaust, and 3.73 gear's.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
Quote:
William
__________________
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
I've seen shoot outs with stock mustang's and they ran as quick as 13.8's but these guy's are pro's I am not a pro, but when I first got my GT i was running a 14.71 and I knno I can get in the 13's but I care about my car so I don't push as hard as i could because it is my everyday car!
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2002 Camaro SS vs. 2003 Mach 1 Mustang
With my camaro i drove it as hard as i wanted and it was a daily driver, it never broke because of it either....maybe that's because it was a chevy
JK i'm sure stock mustangs have hit 13.8's, what is the density altitude where you are at? I have seen mach 1's hit 13s and they're not "pro's" William
__________________
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|