|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ajax, Ont
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
I have been waiting to race a friend of mine for a while now, my 2001 Chrysler Neon R/T 150HP against his Acura RSX(not type S) which is 160HP.
He has 2 things going for him already, the 10 HP advantage and his car has half the KM's that mine does Our cars are both stock I think I am a better stick driver then him, but even if I am it wouldnt be by alot Let me know what you guys think before I go and do it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
he should beat you. allthough you have nearly the same torque specs, his top end power will get you. not by alot, but he should
__________________
Quote:
![]() CHECK OUT MY CARS HERE! drag1320neon and 209neon's babys < 209 neon finished!> |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
If you have MTX you can get him. Unless he has mtx too. if he is auto then you can get him.
__________________
Acting my age is no fun..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ajax, Ont
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
both cars are standard trans.
neither has MTX either..thx for replying btw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
Um, MTX stands for standard or manual. ATX means automatic. I guess I forgot that everybody doesn't know that. Sorry.
If both of you are MTX then he might get ya.
__________________
Acting my age is no fun..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: stockton, California
Posts: 772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
just run him and find out the results might come out good or they might come out bad but you will live to race another day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
__________________
Acting my age is no fun..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St-Eustache
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Take the challenge. If u lose, it's "normal", but if u win you can be proud. Empty fuel tank/high octane could help you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
No high octane. The sohc is designed to run off the low grade stuff.
__________________
Acting my age is no fun..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St-Eustache
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
yeah... thanks FM95 I've forgot 2gen were sohc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ajax, Ont
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
its an R/T DOHC high output engine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned
|
Re: 2001 Neon R/T vs. 2002 Acura RSX-NOT type S
SOHC and the TEG will beat you in the high RPM band once VTEC kicks in, but racing is always fun!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|