Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-01-2004, 12:05 AM   #1
K20 si
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: worthington, Minnesota
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nos Vs. Turbocharger Vs. Supercharger

The first time I got on I posted a question about how to spend the extra $1000 I have. Before I got on, I already have a GReddy Exhaust System and a performance catalytic converter. After the advice I receive I went ahead and order myself a K-series DC Sport Header, AEM Cold Air Intake, 9mm Nology Wires, ACT Stage 2 Racer Clutch, and a Short shifter I also upgraded my ECU. Well, maybe all of these are a little over $1000 but it was money well spent. Now my car redline at 7600 rpm, when it was stock it only redline at 6900 rpm. Not only I can see the differences but I can also feel the differeces when the V-tec started to kick in. With this at hand, I decided to race a RSX typeS. I must say, the typeS is pretty quick but it didn't stay a chance. I don't know how I beat him but I did, maybe because of the driver or because my SI was alot lighter. But that is not the case now, I want to go after the cars with the turbo like an EVO, STi, Supra, MR2, RX8, etc.

That is why I am thinking about giving myself a maxium boost. I need advice on what would be better to get for my car in order for me to take on these high performance stock car. I'm trying to decide between a SUPERCHARGER, TURBOCHARGER, or just plain o NOS. Can you guys tell me which one are the best as far as price vs. hp gose.
K20 si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 12:21 AM   #2
99civic03
AF Enthusiast
 
99civic03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastside, Washington
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 99civic03


That pic is super old, but its needed...NOS is a brand name.
__________________
99civic03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 12:48 AM   #3
K20 si
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: worthington, Minnesota
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Nos Vs. Turbocharger Vs. Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by 99civic03


That pic is super old, but its needed...NOS is a brand name.


NOS....... Nitrous Oxide System. What the fuck is the different. It's still NOS bitch.
K20 si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 01:34 AM   #4
99civic03
AF Enthusiast
 
99civic03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastside, Washington
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 99civic03
Re: Nos Vs. Turbocharger Vs. Supercharger

Woah there man. If you think im being a bitch, think again. Im trying to help you out, before people like eckoman, ricochet, etc etc see this and flame the shit out of you for being a little tfatf ricer boy.
__________________
99civic03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 02:19 AM   #5
K20 si
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: worthington, Minnesota
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Nos Vs. Turbocharger Vs. Supercharger

If you'll not trying to fuck with me then that's cool man. All I want to do is to come on here and exchange idea with ya'll. The only reason why I want advice from you guys is because I think we all can relate in terms of wanting the best for our car for the best price we can get it for. So if you can help me out then that's cool but it you can't then I think it would be nice if you would just keep your quote to yourself.
K20 si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 08:14 AM   #6
CivicEXRider
AF Enthusiast
 
CivicEXRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Simple, the most hp potential would be to add a turbo to the car. Cheapest would be a N2O system but they have a tendancy to be very harsh on the motor.
CivicEXRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2004, 05:13 PM   #7
K20 si
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: worthington, Minnesota
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Nos Vs. Turbocharger Vs. Supercharger

So u saying that a T3/T4 turbo would serve me best rather than the turbocharger and the supercharger would.
K20 si is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2004, 12:29 AM   #8
CivicSiRacer
Civic Mod
 
CivicSiRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Landisville, Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to CivicSiRacer Send a message via AIM to CivicSiRacer
Well there are good sides and bad sides to all those:

Nitrous
Goods: easy to install, pretty easy to tune, low hp shots don't do too much damage.
Bads: you have to find a place to refill, so your fun is only as good on how much gas you have. Some states it's illegal to carry compressed gases in your car. Can get costly if you are trigger happy.

Supercharger
Goods: Instant boost - no turbo lag. Power right from idle to redline in most cases.
Bads: has parasitic drag, since it runs off the motor it takes energy to get power. Some cars are limited on space available for a supercharger. Limited on how much power you can make due to supercharger's pulley.

Turbo
Goods: endless power possibilities. Doesn't have parasitic drag since it runs off exhaust gases.
Bads: sometimes hard to tune correctly. Can get expensive the more power you want, need room for an intercooler to cool the compressed air (which becomes heated). Turbo lag.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Finish First Polish, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Buy my Civic parts!
CivicSiRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2004, 02:22 AM   #9
B1SiR6A
AF Enthusiast
 
B1SiR6A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nassau
Posts: 404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Nos Vs. Turbocharger Vs. Supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by 99civic03
Oldie but a goodie...you wouldn't happen to have that pic with steve (the dell guy) sayin "dude you're gettin NAAAAAAAAAWZ" would you ?
__________________
"Check that young man for nitrous"
12.428 @ 92.5 Mph
Before, Now
12.000 @ 94.1 Mph
On 1000ft Track
Currently 4th in BHRA All Motor Class...Soon to be 2nd (I hope)
...Theres gonna be alotta slow singin, an flower bringin if I hear my car alarm start ringin ...
B1SiR6A is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts