|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gardner, Kansas
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
SRT-10 vs. GTS
This may have already been done, but i just want to see some opinions. tell me what you like or dont like about each of these in performance and looks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Yaya Master
![]() |
i would take the srt-10 its completely improved over the previous gen vipers plus IMO it looks better
and just wait till the coupe version of the srt-10 comes
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
SRT-10. Eats Murcielagos for breakfast on the track...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
i would definitely take the srt-10. first of all, it does look better, and it is faster. i cant wait to see the coupe, i always like coupes better than convertibles.
__________________
![]() ZedEx Crew Member #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Waimanalo, Hawaii
Posts: 446
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Yaya Master
![]() |
guys its nice when you make absolute statements to bring actual data to the table.
like this....side by side comparo of an srt-10 and murcielago: http://www.motortrend.com/features/s...int/index.html btw i would like to add that as far as supercars go the murcielago is among the worse handling ones...suposedly it overloads quite a bit its front tires causing understeer
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Yeah the Murc may not be the most impressive supercars (as far as performing) but none the less, its still impressive in my eyes. You are right Neutrino, it may not be the best handling car. When considering it weights a shy bit over 3600lbs w/o gas this can only further justify its feel and handling traits. I couldn't imagine filling up its 26.4 gallon fuel tank and expect it to fling around with the viper. On the track, I wouldn't be the least suprised if it fell short. Any car vs. a Viper will have its hands very very full.
Whenever I think of a Lambo the first thing to come to mine isn't always performance, but shear elegance fitted for any king. Even a step above Ferarri, and thats saying a lot considering where they stand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 1,515
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
... i like the looks of the murcielago a lot but when audi bought the name they wanted lamborghini to be more of a "practical" car... now wheres the fun in that? if your going to buy a 12 cylinder 2 seater mid engine awd car, i dont know why you would want it to be practical... if you want practical than dont by a lamborghini
also i dont think that f1 cars would have their hands very full since their adverage speed is about 240 or something like that depending on which course... i know thats not a just comparison but u did say n/e car |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
a lambo isnt even on the same level as ferrari let alone above it. a ferrari has performance and looks in one package.
there is an article in motortrend about hennessey tuning up the srt-10. the hennessey 650R (srt-10) stats: 0-60-3.0 sec 1/4 mile-10.76 sec. and these times are with n/a.
__________________
![]() ZedEx Crew Member #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Here for the pussy, man.
![]() |
Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
ze Chermans ruined ze Lamborghini
Seriously the Murcie is a fricking boat, bin the AWD, save some weight and make a GT version I say.I wouldn't trust Hennessey with a Civic, yet alone a Viper. And I'll take the SRT10, what the original Viper should have been, ze Chermans didn't ruin zis car zey made eet better!!!!!
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
Quote:
on that. Even though I think the Murc is absolutely great at where it is at, a little weight saving would of made it only better. Only if they made a AWD/RWD option on the car.....that would of gave them one of the best of both worlds.Quote:
![]() Quote:
even though the Murc is damn sexy, I'm still going to have to give the thumbs up to Dodge in their new Viper. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
CFA
![]() Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
The Red Baron
![]() |
Re: SRT-10 vs. GTS
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|