 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
11-26-2015, 12:51 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
New Explorer - engine question
I'm a huge fan of Ford's SUVs, now I've got 2005 Explorer, over 180K miles and I think the time is come. I really interested in 2016 Explorer, engine range has 3 engines, one traditional V6 and two is turbocharged.
2.3L is impressively fuel-efficient, but what for reliability? And turbocharger meaning premium fuel only? Will it better to buy a N/A V6? Last edited by shorod; 11-27-2015 at 11:05 AM. Reason: Moderator removed unnecessary link to dealer site. |
|
|
|
|
11-27-2015, 11:08 AM
|
#2 | |
|
SHO No Mo
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 10,996
Thanks: 105
Thanked 358 Times in 349 Posts
|
Re: New Explorer - engine question
The EcoBoost turbo engines have been pretty reliable so I wouldn't be too concerned with the reliability any more than any other modern engine. Also, with all of the sensors on a modern engine, just because and engine has a turbo does not mean it will require premium fuel. However, the engine will "de-tune" if you're not using premium, therefore you will not get the advertised power if you choose to run lower octane fuel.
Also I would caution that very few EcoBoost owners actually yield the advertised fuel economy numbers during normal driving. -Rod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
