|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brakes
Auto zone duralast ceramics
or Advanced auto Wearever ceramics What say you
__________________
'92 s-10 4x4 EC p/u '99 Blazer LT '99 Suburban LT |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brakes
I historically used the Wearever (non-ceramic) on many vehicles....because they were cheap. Keeping that in mind, you get what you pay for. They would be dusty, and not last particularly long. Several months ago I put the Duralast ceramics (and new rotors) on my 99 4X4 Blazer. They have a better braking power to them now, little or no dust, and so far seem to be lasting better. For my money I go with the Duralast.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brakes
go advanced warever.
they also come with a life time warrenty |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Brakes
Just and update on this older post regarding my ceramic Duralast CMax pads. I put these on my S10 pickup too with new rotors. After 40,000 miles I'm starting to notice the brakes "moan", and I've had some issues with braking power. I clean the pads and rotors (front and back) every 2-3 months, and there is very little dust. What I'm seeing is the rotors are smooth as mirrors. I believe the ceramic is such a hard material that it polished the rotors. The brake "moan" is the slippage as the pad tries to grab. I'm interest in anyone's opinions or experience with this. I'm thinking about turning the rotors and going back to semi-metallics. As for the Blazer 4x4, it is fine with the same set-up, but I haven't driven it as much.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|