|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Performance Discuss Engine, Suspension, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portage, Michigan
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I am trying to decide what engine would be better to buy in a mustang, either a1996-1999 4.6 liter or a 1994-1995 5.0liter. I looking to buy this model but cannot decide what will be better to add upgrades to or which is the better motor. I have a 86 5.0 Conv that I am selling and that engine is pretty stout. Any ideas or opinions are welcome, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
if you want cheap parts, 5.0...if you want better technology 4.6
__________________
FORMERLY: zx2srdotnet(1,380 posts) 2001 Esxort ZX2 - Traded 2000 Escort ZX2 S/R - Sold 2003 Mustang Mach1 - Totaled 2014 Altima 2.5 S - Purchasing Soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
well if 1999 is truely an option, then get that. i think that was mistake though, i think you probably meant 98, 99 is a new generation. but if your lookin at the 94-98 generation, go with the 5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
I'd get the 5.0, or the 99 4.6 if thats what you meant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bloomington, Illinois
Posts: 616
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
If you get the 5.0 you can-work on the car yourself, have a ton of aftermarket parts to choose from, have plenty of room to work under the hood, and the parts you get for a 5.0 will be INEXPENSIVE NOT CHEAP!
If you get the 4.6 you can-do SOME of the engine work yourself (who wants to mess with 2 cams/chains just looks like a mess, maybe I'm not looking close enough but, I can't even see where the plug wires go to change the wires and plugs), have a few aftermarket parts to choose from (although it's getting better), have less room to work under hood, and pay an arm and a leg for parts. They are both good engines, one nice thing about the 4.6 is that you don't have a distributor, intead it has coil packs. Obviously I'm biased but, I would get the 5.0. If you must get the 4.6 make sure it's 1999 and up. The 96-98 wasn't as good. Had all the technology but had no more power/torque than the 5.0. In 99 it had 260hp stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Regular
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
do you want an SN-95? if you dont mind a fox body get a 87-92 because they have forged internals, dont waste your time with an NPI 4.6 and just go to a PI 4.6 if you can afford it
__________________
2004 F350 6.0 4x4 auto SRW SCT X3 with innovative tunes, autometer boost/trans/pyro, AFE stage 2, MBRP 4" no muffler or cat, EGR delete, ARP studs, 8' fisher MM2, misc appearance 90 F350 7.3 IDI 4x4 SRW (sold) bolt on 02 mustang 232 4R70W vert (sold) built 88 toyota pickup (sold) bolt on 92 camaro LO3 TBI (sold) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
Do they have forged internals or is it just cast cast parts? I know people like them better for supercharging because they don't have the aluminum pistons like the later years did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
AF Regular
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
Quote:
__________________
2004 F350 6.0 4x4 auto SRW SCT X3 with innovative tunes, autometer boost/trans/pyro, AFE stage 2, MBRP 4" no muffler or cat, EGR delete, ARP studs, 8' fisher MM2, misc appearance 90 F350 7.3 IDI 4x4 SRW (sold) bolt on 02 mustang 232 4R70W vert (sold) built 88 toyota pickup (sold) bolt on 92 camaro LO3 TBI (sold) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
AF Regular
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
__________________
2004 F350 6.0 4x4 auto SRW SCT X3 with innovative tunes, autometer boost/trans/pyro, AFE stage 2, MBRP 4" no muffler or cat, EGR delete, ARP studs, 8' fisher MM2, misc appearance 90 F350 7.3 IDI 4x4 SRW (sold) bolt on 02 mustang 232 4R70W vert (sold) built 88 toyota pickup (sold) bolt on 92 camaro LO3 TBI (sold) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
yeah i know about justins car, but do you know how reliable it is for everyday use with that kinda boost?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
Justins car is a track car, not a DD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Medway, Ohio
Posts: 3,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
well he did say its very driveable on the street, but my question is still whens it gonna break running that much boost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
Its definatly streetable, but he still doesent use it as a DD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
AF Newbie
|
Re: 5.0 or 4.6?
87-92 mustangs did not all have foged internals. 87-89 5.0's came with cast cranks, cast rods, and hypereutectic pistons. 90-92's came with with cast cranks, cast rods, and forged pistons. IMO forged pistons are not considered forged internals, and forged pistons will not allow you to run more boost, they will allow you to run nitrous safely, beefier crank and rods will strengthen your rotating assembly- more psi is possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|