Quote:
Originally posted by Cbass
I think the article was quite well conceived, and quite accurate as well. It could have been written better, but that's moot.
I find that a common debating practice is to ridicule anything you cannot refute. It's a bad practice, it makes the debator seem unreasonable, and exposes that they cannot refute it, if they repeat the pattern.
A much better practice is to entirely ignore the issue, by not debating, the issue fades quickly, and not as many people will notice. I can see Ari Fleischer has much left to teach you 
|
Actually I was refuting it. I just realized that refuting line by line somthing that poorly written and full of inaccuracies was a waste of time.