Quote:
Originally posted by Murco
Probably the "global warming" B/S... It's junk science, a theory never proven true even though it's a banner for many, and the majority of world scientists discount it entirely!!
|
That is outright wrong. In fact, it is an absolute insult to me. I took 2 semesters worth of courses themed on global change. I have spoken with researchers who have devoted thier careers to find evidence that global change IS NOT occuring, but evidence suggests the opposite. Unlike politicians though, most scientists don't lie. Nobel prize winners are like the cream of the crop of scientists. They are like superscientists.... do you think they'd sign something based on "junk science??????????????" The evidence is unbelievably overwhelming for occurence of global warming, go to your local university and ask ecology and geography profs if you don't believe me. I've seen all sorts of graphs correlating increase of CO2 with increase of temperature, of ice core samples, of certain polar regions diminishing. Sources that tell you otherwise are almost certainly funded by an industry like oil, which would be like going somewhere funded by a tobacco company to obtain information on harmfulness of smoking.
want a couple unbiased links on global warming??
http://www.wri.org/
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_...yoto&Beyond.asp
http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/spm22-01.pdf (if you can't get to this link directly, click and download this article: WG I "Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis" from the homepage)
http://www.ipcc.ch