View Single Post
  #3199  
Old 09-06-2014, 05:56 PM
kris's Avatar
kris kris is offline
Off playing with fire.
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,371
Thanks: 22
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
Re: SERIOUSLY OT: Calling all chicks! IT'S PART 6!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSilentChamber View Post
Your also a liar, that was posted weeks ago... so much for your popping in a few times a week.

Seriously? Yep, I've been gone since the 22nd. Makes me a liar. The inappropriate language infraction was the only one that closely matched what I found to be objectionable, which was porn overlayed with wallpaper. Even you guys discussed getting away with it. Swear away, it's not deemed inappropriate here.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CivicSpoon View Post
Wow, what the hell is that shit? No more inappropriate language, because all the people who abandoned this site long ago, suddenly come back out of the blue? If us 3 didn't hold down the fort, there would have been nothing to come back to (pardon my ego).

Infractions seem a bit much. They couldn't have just been verbal warnings, something to the tune of "Ok, you got us, we haven't been here moderating all but a handful of times in the past year. We're deleting the posts and letting you know that type of thing is not ok, so just don't do it again. " And then move on from there? Especially when there is a special area of the forum where posting "inappropriate" pics of scantaly clad women, boob bouncing & ass shaking gifs are allowed, as long as there's no visible nipples/bare genitalia/butt holes.

The 3 of you are hardly holding down the fort, just keeping the pointless thread active with your posts. Like it our not, the Forum Guidelines are still in effect, and are still valid. Your NWS thread is only visible to a few people, not everyone who cares to view it. The infraction system is your "verbal warning", that's what it's been designed for. Drop Igor an email if you really care that much.

The infraction system has canned selections, the inappropriate language was the closest selection I could use. Besides the description which I put said what it was for, and was not read.

Each moderator views things differently, but complacency is a poor excuse for anything.
Reply With Quote