Thread: Btw...
View Single Post
  #4  
Old 04-26-2010, 02:43 PM
Brian R.'s Avatar
Brian R. Brian R. is offline
Resident Chemist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,586
Thanks: 105
Thanked 157 Times in 157 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Brian R.
Re: Btw...

Bigger is not better. I like the 1996-2002 years for their reliability. Size was pretty optimum also. Weak points, hard to find a standard transmission and needed locking rear end as an option on all models with 4WD.

I like the engine and transmission in the modern 4-runners, but not the size.
__________________
Forum Guidelines:http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/guidelines.html

"What we've got here is a failure to communicate"
Reply With Quote