Thread: LS1 vs LS1
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:30 PM
-The Stig-'s Avatar
-The Stig- -The Stig- is offline
On Fire!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,844
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to -The Stig-
Re: LS1 vs LS1

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepgclwj View Post
The guy that tuned my car told me that an LS1 is an LS1 is an LS1.

He said that the f-body LS1 were underated because of the vette and that they are rated at 350and thats why most LS1s dyno at 300ish to the rear wheels...

This is true to an extent. Each year the LS1 got a bit better than the previous.

If you dyno a stock zero mile 1997 LS1 against a stock zero mile 2004 LS1, the 2004 motor will make a lot more power. Mostly because in 2001, the LS1 got a LS6 intake manifold stock, and a milder cam.
__________________
2003 Chevy 1500HD - Hauler
1971 Chevy Camaro RS - Track Car


User Guidelines It's important to read, like the Bible. But unlike the Bible we will strike you down if you jerk off around here.

Reply With Quote