|
Re: S/C Thunderbird vs BMW 525 Sport & 5.0 Mustang GT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SL3000gt
It could be because the lower end Bimmers are more common, younger people tend to own them more often and younger people tend to race more often, and because M3's are a push over (  ). |
+1
Its either a 94 or 95. Anyways, he just figured out how to get it out of economy mode, and into M mode (or something like that) and he thought he was the shit.
Yah, the SC makes 315 tq at 2800, so it makes quite a bit down low tq. Downside is she gets major wheel hop (and will start to break shit) in the lower range, so I take full advantage of the top end, where it makes nearly 14psi of boost.
__________________
2002 F150 SuperCab FX4 6" Fabtech, 3" BL, Detroit locker, Edge tuned, Yukon 4.56s, 37" Nittos, Harley lights, Depo fogs, 8K HIDs, Powerstop brakes
1992 Lincoln Mark VII LSC 302 H.O, A9L ECU swap, 65mm TB, 73mm Granetelli MAF, FRPP 30lb injectors, Walbro 255, MSD ignition, Powerdyne BD11 supercharger, Efans, T-5 swap w/ FRPP flywheel, Ram HDX clutch and adjustable Steeda clutch quadrant, 4.10 gears, Nitto NT555R radials
2000 OBS Tahoe Z71 6k HIDs, 33" Goodyears. 280k mile daily beater
|