Quote:
|
Originally Posted by giddyup50
I think they actually called it a Mach II instead of a Mach I. I agree with you on the 2.3. I don't know about a 2.2, especially being a v6?! Are you sure it's not a 4cyl.? Another reason the 74-79 Mustangs were not popular is because they looked too much like a Pinto. Commonly known as "Pintostangs". As for 70-73 Mustangs, I've seen many go for alot of money. Aslong as they're in good shape. Ofcourse the 70 and 71-73 are two different styles. But I've seen some 71-73 go pretty good, especially if they're a 351 Boss or have a Cleveland or just kept up good.
|
personally, despite being heavy i think the 71-73 are badass. my fav year is 68 tho.
Ford did used to have a coupld of straight 6 engines that they used. are you sure its not one of those? i know they had a 200cid but thats bigger than 2.2l, but they had a smaller one too. like 150 or something.
actually over in australia they still use a 4.0l inline 6... and its a pretty decent engine.