View Single Post
  #7  
Old 03-22-2006, 11:28 PM
BP2K2Max's Avatar
BP2K2Max BP2K2Max is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,079
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to BP2K2Max
Re: 2002 Fuel octane

Quote:
Originally Posted by eightballsidepocke
I'm telling yah......the performance difference between 87 octane and 90+ is very negligible.

In fact 87 octane actually had more BTU value than the higher octanes.........higher octane just means that there more anti-knock chemicals in it to cause a slower combustion burn, to avoid pre-ignition(knock/ping).
it depends on what you consider negligible. this was brought up on another forum i frequent and someone dyno'ed their car with 89 octane and again with 93 and posted the results:



and that's compared to 89 octane, it's probably even more of a loss running 87. some people spend good money modifying a car to gain 12 hp and 13 ft-lbs. of tq, especially at the wheels. It seems a shame to throw that power away to save a few cents per gallon.


This is the original thread topic:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....ar#post3520382
__________________
BP's Rides;
- 2005 Kawasaki Ninja ZX6R- Mods: ECU Jumper, Akrapovic Slip-on, Power Commander III, 8000K HID's.
- 2K2 Maxima 6 Speed-Mods: Advanced Timing, Cattman Cat-back Exhaust, H&R Springs, Tokico Illumina Struts, Konig Theory 19" Rims.

Last edited by BP2K2Max; 03-23-2006 at 03:38 PM.
Reply With Quote