Quote:
Originally posted by Neutrino
I started contradicting you because the way you put it sounded like you wanted the internet to be based on 802.11 wich made no sense. And sorry to contradict you again but it would not be a good way to "distribute" to the end user. Maybe to be used by the end user but not to be used by an ISP to distribute. Although maybe I am too picky at your words and you meant something else.
And for the homework attack it was because it sounded like that is all you know. And this is just an observation but you might want to be more explicit in some of the posts so other people won't missunderstand you.
And me to I know what I am talking about because I am a student with my first major in Electronics and Information technology at a major university and have a job as a Sys Admin.
|
No worries bro, I'm not pissed
Just a bit frustrated because usualy I have no problems saying what I mean, but sometimes no matter what I say people missunderstand me
Any how, what I was, and am now, trying to say is that a wireless network from local hubs to the end user will most likely be the next step in the internet. I only say 802.11 because (yes jinuseun) it was the first thing that popped into mind when I thought wireless communication. I'm sure by the time that the internet advances to that stage there will be a much better and more secure transfer protocal out there. But unless handhelds start getting more memory on them, would you really need a T1 to your palm
Wait, what am I saying, of course you do! I don't know why, but I'm sure there's a reason