View Single Post
  #7  
Old 10-25-2005, 08:28 PM
OverAllComa OverAllComa is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 792
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to OverAllComa
Re: Re: vortech supercharger

Quote:
Originally Posted by millrtime
agreed, i was gonna ask wat year u had, but w/ my personal experience w/ an 00 2.2, a 99 z24 and my own 03 ecotec, i would say the ecotec by far, and the 2.2 way in last, not a lot of room and a lot of tricky things about the older models u have to be careful of
From what I've learned the Twin Cams are the best way to go if you were heading down the NA route. Mainly because there are quite a few awesome upgrades you can pick up at a junkyard from a HO or a W41 Quad4. Also, the GM Supercharger is beastly for that car, especially when it has accompanying mods for breathing.

The Ecotec is just plain all-around solid, but takes to boost like a son of a bitch. A turbo ecotec is a beast that few 4-bangers can keep pace with.

The OHV is a great configuration for any non-inline motor. I mean, hell, everything from the Vette to the Viper has mastered the pushrod, but it's just not as useful for an inline motor. They do, however, have very VERY solid pickup in the low RPMs. My old 3.1 launched like a BEAST, but in the higher RPMs it dogged down. Ah..the joy that was 185 lb/tq from the factory.
__________________
1992 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 *R.I.P.*
3.1L MPFI (3.1 6cylinder Pushrod 12V)
1997 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 *R.I.P.*
2.4L "Twin Cam" (2.4 4cylinder DOHC 16V)
2003 Honda Accord EX V6 - The new hotness
Reply With Quote