View Single Post
Old 10-12-2005, 05:40 PM   #6
youngvr4
STREET RACING GURU
 
youngvr4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 1994 3000gt SL vs. 2000 Subaru Impreza RS

That said, the RS's acceleration isn't quite as lively as we might have expected based on its size and engine power. The discrepancy might be explained by gearing, or by the character of the boxer engine. There's plenty of acceleration-producing torque in the middle of the power band, yet the engine is weak at very low rpm, and it runs out of steam well before its 6200-rpm redline. Gear ratios also contribute. While most cars will reach 60 mph in second gear, the Impreza RS requires an upshift to third just past 50 mph, adding as much as 0.4 second to the O-60 times. Although the RS has shorter throws than a standard Impreza, its shifter isn't the world's most precise, and it's fairly easy to miss a gear in the heat of a spirited drive. Yet overall, with its fat power band in the middle of the rev range, the Impreza RS is more responsive, and more entertaining, than a host of other subcompact automobiles.

stock for stock they would be a good race
a modded 3kgt vs a basicly stock rs, the 3kgt should pull out the win
__________________
youngvr4 is offline   Reply With Quote