|
In defense of the fox body's looks, the 87-93 were alot better looking than the 79-86, I wasn't a big fan of the 4 eye fox. Also, that was how cars looked back then. The camaro was boxy too, maybe a little longer though. I am also a camaro fan but the camaros of the period were not as good in my opinion as the 5.0 Mustang. Most were the 305, which was definately not as good as the 302, and the ones that had 350s were automatic.(maybe I am mistaken but I am pretty sure) As for the gas mileage...you got me there, it certainly won't top a 4 banger for that, but I have owned 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder cars and liked them enough, but I don't ever think I can go back. The insurance really didn't increase when I got the mustang and I had a taurus before. I am just a firm believer that because of the natural good aspects of the 5.0 mustang and the giant aftermarket, anyone looking for cheap performance would be happiest purchasing one.
|