View Single Post
Old 04-19-2005, 12:33 PM   #15
BlazerLT
AF -Advisor
Thread starter
 
BlazerLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Auto-RX Desludging a 4.3L

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
Here is the question I asked on another forum and was answered by GM engineer on BOBSTHEOILGUY forum....

-----------------------------

I would like you to address the various concoctions like system flushes, Auto-Rx, Fuel Power, and all these "fix-in-a-bottle" additives that we on this forum seem to gravitate to.

Do you recommend them ? Or simply put, is the new API/SM/GF-4 oil's sufficient to keep today's engines running without all the extra bottles of 'stuff' ?

I'd offer to say that most on this forum keep their cars running in a well maintained form, but have to ask are we really only moving our lubrication from 99.1% perfect (before flush) to 99.5% (after flush)...so why go through all that nonsense......right ?

While we have rinse phases, cleaning phases etc...are just fooling ourselves and if we say dumped in fresh new oil and say did a 1500 OCI that we'd get the same results......

Your thoughts.......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bbobynski writes:

Auto-Rx....????......LOL LOL LOL LOL

Personally, I have yet to ever see any of the snake oil additives and crap do anything other than relocate your money to another persons pocket. If someone is talking it up they must be selling it.
Nope, not selling it, IN FACT paid a lot more to have it shipped to Canada. Ask him if he is even used it, or is he just stated blind opinion?

Probably so.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
ANYONE who has taken apart a modern engine run on modern oils knows that the engines look brand new inside. What on earth would be the need for flushes or rinses or additives or ????? ..... other than to make money for someone.
How old are these engines? What year and model?

No real info = pure opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
The best possible "cleaner" for your engine is fresh, clean SG4/SM engine oil. It has all the "cleaners" and detergents necessary to keep the engine perfectly clean for hundreds of thousands of miles. Anyone that tells you about the horrors of sludge or the need for cleaning or flushing is selling cleaner or flushes and has never had an engine apart.
GF4 oils have only been out for the last year. So now you are saying that if you do an oil change now, it will clear up the 10 years worth of varnish??? MAybe after another 50,000 miles it will.

Talk about misguided information. GF4 oils were only recently released and you are saying that they will clean an engine with 150,000 miles on it.

That is completely wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
I get to review core engines at teardown for one of our re-man facilities on occasion and it is a real eye-opener.....as to just how clean most of the engines are. There are always some horror stories where the engine was totally neglected or the owner was running SA "virgin" motor oil from the Dollar Giant store but, by and large, they are perfectly clean inside. I also get to see a lot of field engines in teardown reviews and there is no problem with sludge and buildup in any of the engines I see.
How old are these engines? What year and model?

No real info = pure opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
I know that there are specific problems in the industry with certain engines that may have had a difficiency in the PCV system and the crankcase evacuation that led to sludge buildup due to excessive water vapor/blowby on coldstarts. If that is the case one might make a case for a crank case "flush" I suppose....but by the time you knew about it the damage was probably already done. And, in any case, some long trip driving with fresh oil would clean it out anyway.
So he warrents the use of a kerosene flush, but not the use of Auto-RX?

Ummmmmmmmm....ok.......yeesh

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
For most all the engines on the road, especially if it is a GM engine with an open PCV system that always pulls fresh air, you have little or nothing to worry about deposits and cleaners and additives are a waste of money, not needed and certainly not recommended.
Pure opinion with no evidence at all. How about the lot that have working PCV systems and they have varnish and sludge?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyMazz
Imagine....we managed to develop a 440+ HP supercharged 4.4 liter Northstar engine that absolutely kicks *** and never used any oil additives or Auto-Rx......LOL
Imagine...... How does using Auto-RX for cleaning an older engine have anything to do with building a 440+HP engine???!!! That's right, it has no bearing.

What kind of argument is that?

Everyone, go to here and look at the people using Auto-RX:

http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/...?ubb=forum;f=5

Not only are people using it, but they are happy using it too.

Here is a story of a documented Auto-RX test.

http://www.rms13.com/

GET INFORMED AND DON'T BE BLINDED BY THE PARANOID.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.

Last edited by BlazerLT; 04-19-2005 at 02:26 PM.
BlazerLT is offline   Reply With Quote