View Single Post
  #14  
Old 04-04-2005, 12:30 PM
will69camaro will69camaro is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 492
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to will69camaro
Re: Re: Re: Collaboration project competed...(Camaro ī69)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DukeMan
Thanks for your two first sentences, unfortunally I have no idea what you mean by "cheesy"...
I just have to ask you a simple question, did you even read the text?
As for the wheels, maybe itīs got a Air Ride suspension, what do you know?
Isīnt "pro-touring" kind of like a modern hot rod, I mean your own interprentation of how you would like the car to look like? At least thatīs mine and (I think) many otherīs idea of "pro-touring" since there is a "pro-touring"-meet thread here on AF.
What is "pro-touring" to you then I must ask, if you donīt mind?
I didnt' see your comment on the tail lights. I'd say try and change them as the 3-d look doesn't fit the car... As for the "air-ride" suspension, most cars at shows which is what i'd expect a model car to be built to represent (a car at a show) the air ride would be dropped to give the car a nice look and not look like a 4x4. By cheesy i was trying to put a nice spin on saying that the rear of the car doesn't do the rest of it justice. From the front that car looks stunning (stance aside), then i got to the rear/trunk area and was let down. I know what pro-touring means to me as well as the people that actually BUILD 1:1 pro-touring cars as i've been a member of sites such as www.pro-touring.com and www.lateral-g.net since WAY before pro-touring became the mainstream and hit every major magazine and turned into cars like the one in your signature (more looks than function).

William
__________________
Reply With Quote