[eillob]

Originally Posted by zx2srdotnet

A good driver can run high 13's in a vr-4 all day long with even a 13.5-6 pull or 3


so you basicly said that if you add 300lbs to a mach1 it wont see 13s?
Mach1 : VR-4
320HP@5800 : 320HP@6000
320TQ@4200 : 315TQ@2500 rpm
3469lbs : 3760lbs
13.2 1/4 : 13.5 1/4

so you basicly said that if you add 300lbs to a mach1 it wont see 13s?

First You started comparing the 5.0 to the VR-4, now your on the Mach 1. Make up your mind.

so you basicly said that if you add 300lbs to a mach1 it wont see 13s?

I have no idea where the hell that came from. I know you have better sense then to try to say that because their stats are similar their the same car. Well maybe you don't, let me enlighted you.

Your stats look pretty accurate, you just forgot one of the most important differences between these two.

Mach 1
baseprice $28,000

VR-4
baseprice $44,000

Now what idiot would go out and spend an extra $14,000 dollars for a heavier VR-4 when you can have a faster lighter Mach 1 for less money.
I mean besides you, why would anyone do that. And just for the record you don't need a Mach 1 to beat a VR-4. You can take a stock 5.0 put heads on it and all of the other typical bolt ons and walk all over that VR-4 for a HELL of a lot less money if you wanna nit pick. So you can keep your overweight rice rocket. I'll take my stang any day.