|
If there were such a thing as a stock 2.0L n/a or even a stock turbo 2.0L i might have to agree. A naturally aspirated 2.0 L would have to be running at rpm's of F1 proportion to dream of 350 hp, while a 2.0 turbo would still have a very hard time.
Odds are you wont find a turbo engine in the same class as a n/a engine with the same displacement though. In reality you would find a 2.5L (STi) against a much larger engine like a 3.5 (350z). Or a n/a 5.0L (E60 M5) against a 4.2t (RS6). Now in this, more realistic comparison which engine will be more reliable?
|