Thread: fuel economy
View Single Post
  #1  
Old 05-12-2004, 07:37 PM
Murray B. Murray B. is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 73
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fuel economy

Its not quite a muscle car but my favorite car was a '69 Wildcat with 430-4 (360 H.P.). It gave 17 mpg (Canadian 160 ounce gallon) under normal circumstances and 25 when cruising at a constant 75 mph. Try as I might to conserve fuel those darned old police just kept giving me tickets. Guess they weren't environmentally friendly.

My least favorite car was a '76 T-bird with 460 (220 H.P.). It could barely move its own weight and only gave 7 or 8 mpg on a good day. This was a common problem with Detroit iron made between '73 and '78.

Now I keep hearing about the "gas guzzlers of the sixties" on at least a monthly basis from mass media talking heads. That is a big lie. Cars of the sixties gave better mileage and performance because they were just more efficient. Truth is it was the post-environmental-lobby-cars of the seventies that were the gutless gas guzzlers.

The media won't quit lying so it is up to us '60s lovers to get the truth out. First truth is that muscle cars were extremely rare. Second truth is that no matter how much HP was produced during the sixties it was still done efficiently.

It is up to us to get the facts out there because nobody else is going to do it. It needs to be done before they legislate yet another injury to the American car industry. Who is with me?
Reply With Quote