View Single Post
  #6  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:14 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

The 240 is slower b/c we have a driveshaft and a rearend to turn. the integra also has the advantage of all the weight of the engine and transmission on the front wheels adding traction. The only minus would be the gas tank.

I didnt think i would have to spell it out, man. It goes without saying that the driveshaft is heavy. Heavier stuff is harder to spin than light stuff. It also goes without saying that the differential being separate from the transmission and in a separate housing in the rear adds more weight to an already heavier car.

http://www.acura.com/preowned/pre_modlib_index.asp

1998 Acura Integra

Curb Weight, Manual - GS-R
2672 lbs (1212 kg

Weight Distribution, (%)front/rear - GS-R,GS
64/36


1.8-liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve DOHC, 140 hp @ 6300 rpm, 124 lbs-ft-torque @ 5200 rpm

www.240sx.org
Car Weights
These are from the "NADA Official Used Car Price Guide"

1990 (SOHC)
Coupe XE - 2657
Fastback SE - 2684

1992 (DOHC)
Coupe - 2699
Fastback - 2730
Coupe SE - 2712
Fastback SE - 2747
Fastback LE - 2748

1994
Convertible - 2870

1995
Coupe - 2815
Coupe SE - 2821

the power is 155HP@5600 and 160ft-lbs at 4400.

you make the decision. I'm not even sure anymore. 240 still kicks ass. FR owns FF any day of the week.

Last edited by nissanfanatic; 03-03-2004 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote