|
Truly sorry if the story is true.
... but I am among the doubters.
He claims to have watched a highway video of the accident.
If they were, in fact traveling at 110mph + then there is no way that one stationary camera could have covered that much distance.
.... I'd guestimate a camera may view at most a 1/4 mile or so... which would have been about 8 seconds of footage at that speed. Hardly enough time to cover all the details he gave ... unless there was multiple cameras.
I hate to be a skeptic, but there is no way this type of accident, caught on video, wouldn't have made national news.
|