View Single Post
Old 11-18-2003, 01:16 AM   #58
carrrnuttt
AF Fanatic
 
carrrnuttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 6,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 3000gt vr4 vs Supra turbo

Quote:
Originally Posted by youngvr4
those are the numbers 14.2 that carnut posted is for the 1st gen vr4's
95 and up run 13.5.
so the race is the driver PERIOD.
On the contrary, if you stop and read the article, they are testing the 95 model with the 6-spd and 320HP -- 2nd Gen. 1st-gens have 5-speeds and 300HP.

Also, if you actually read the ACTUAL articles I linked to, as opposed something somebody posted up on a personal website, one of the tests on the Supra netted a 13.1 @ 109 mph.

That other test was obviously in bad conditions, since all the cars, EXCEPT FOR THE SUPRA ran in the 14's. Not saying that VR-4's arent capable of mid-13's, but when everything else is equal, including driver and conditions, the Supra has major E.T. and trap-speed advantages over the VR-4.

What do you think the guy running 13.5's in a VR-4 in certain conditions on the same track, knowing how to launch the car, will run with a Supra? 13.0?

Here's the acceleration graph of each car:




Look at where the Supra beats icons like the Ferrari F50, Viper, and the Porsche 911 Turbo in top-gear acceleration here:



I don't see the VR-4 in that list.

Look, I'm not knocking the VR-4 in any way here, but you gotta be realistic with the power claims. I mean you're right in saying that it's a driver's race, just like it's a driver's race between a Civic HX and a Geo Metro...the HX driver slips up, it's over.

But we know that the same person driving the two cars WILL go faster in one car than the other, ya know?
__________________
2002_Nissan_Maxima_6-speed
carrrnuttt is offline   Reply With Quote