
10-07-2003, 09:06 AM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
Re: Re: need answers.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shiftlock
Techniclly it isn't really 1.3liters.The math that Mazda uses to determine this is a little off.I went out of my way to dig up the proper calculations of the displacement.It is actually 2.6 liters,their way of calculating displacement in rotaries really doesn't make a lot of sense,Mazda uses a two stroke method.Considering displacement was the displacement of one rotary per chamber.The rotary has seperate intake,compression,exhaust,and power strokes.So that makes it a four stroke,So really the measurement is how much combustion volume gets sucked in two revolutions.Each chamber displaces 654cc,mazdas two stroke method is 1308cc,but it is really 2616cc.So the 1.3l is a two stroke measurement,which is incorrect,so it is double which equals 2.6.
and about the engine code comment,you didn't need to call someone an idiot,and yes I just made you look like an idiot,If your going to call someone an idiot,get your facts straight.Their was no need for that comment,he said he knew nothing about rotary cars,he most likely knew nothing about Mazda engine codes.
|
all that shit you just typed was just copied from some fag in sport compact car. Its BS.
|