|
Re: 2007 Camaro Concept
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlkCamaroSS
Whoa whoa whoa, back up the train. When did it become customary to rip on a 4th Gen F-body with a V8 for gas mileage?
How in the world can a daily driver truck, which would be lucky to see 20mpg in neutral with the engine off, be a better choice than a V8 F-body which sees 30 mpg on the highway, and about 24-25 in traffic? I don't think it's just me, but I know that trucks and SUV's are not making better gas mileage than either a V6 or a V8 Camaro or Firebird...
|
No disagreeing with you BlkCamaroSS, but aren't your city mpg estimates a bit off? I have never gotten over 300 on a tank, and I drive mostly city, with a bit of highway mixed in. That means no better than 20 mpg for me, and that's pushing it. And on a scale of 1 to 10 in terms of agressive driving, I am about a 3.
__________________
2002 Navy Blue Metallic Camaro
M5, 3.23's
Stereo: 2 RF HE2 DVC subs, 600w MA amp.
Performance Mods: Z28 Catback, Cutout
Appearance Mods: 35% side, 5% rear tint
Charcoal leather seats
Comming soon: 3.73's, LSD, Air Lid, VS Cam
Not in that order....
|