View Single Post
  #6  
Old 09-06-2003, 02:43 AM
k6kicker k6kicker is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to k6kicker Send a message via Yahoo to k6kicker
Re: i had a similar problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by xxdeadby28xx
i had a similar problem. i have a 95 eclipse and i took it to new york for a trip, and while i was there i had an oil change but the mechanics didn't put new oil in, and i totally burned out my engine. so obviously i had to buy a new one, but i learned that chrystler makes the exact same engine, and its a lot easier to find and a lot cheaper, it cost me like 800 bucks for an entire new engine, i was kind of worried buying a chrystler engine, but it worked out fine and im really happy with it.

i dont know if u can do the same with ur car since its a different model engine. mines a 2.0l 1997 cubic inches, and a 5-speed manual, but u should still check out some of the chrystler engines, it'll be a lot easier to find.
yep the dohc 2.0 that goes is in the neon is called the 420a when its sued in the eclpise...its in the nonturbo 2ng gens (with the expection fo the nonturbo spyder, which got a n/a 4g63) while it may be cheaper to buy the neon version of the motor (4dre or4dfe) the knock sensor's are in differnt places and they have more restrictive heads and its just not cool, might even have wierd motor mounts (to fit the neon not an eclipse) honestly, i would avoid these motors since they are know to have weak head gaskets and i would go for a n/a 4g63...you could later on do a real turbo conversion if you wanted (ecu, pistons, rods) and would have a MUCH more trustworthy motor
__________________
It sucks out there and I'm never going back
Reply With Quote