Our Community is over 1 Million Strong. Join Us.


h22/h23 turbocharging question...


iceiso
04-03-2003, 04:12 PM
posted this in the prelude section but i guess not many ppl frequent that board...

right now, i'm saving up for a h22a engine into my accord. i want to keep all my options open for the future for potential (which is why i didn't just turbocharge my f22 for power). i have heard that h23's are better for turbocharging. what is the difference between the two engines, and why is it better for turbocharging? what are the specs of each N/A, and what kind of potential difference are we talking about here? which kind of turbo or turbo kit would be the best to get? any other related information would be very helpful. thanks for replies!

TerryJoe
04-13-2003, 09:11 PM
the h22 is to high compression for the turbo, and isnt gonna be good at handling boost. how far are u wanting to go with your performance upgrades,whats your goal as to what u want out of your motor.
that readdy can determen your needs on what u do with the motor

my 2 cents

drift
04-16-2003, 05:13 PM
Originally posted by TerryJoe
the h22 is to high compression for the turbo, and isnt gonna be good at handling boost. how far are u wanting to go with your performance upgrades,whats your goal as to what u want out of your motor.
that readdy can determen your needs on what u do with the motor

my 2 cents


H22A compression: 10.1:1
H23A compression: 9.8:1

not much difference, and can be evened out with a thicker headgasket.

the only reason why people praise the H23 on boost is the fact that they dont own an H22. as for competitive drag racing, the H22 is usually demodded to a non-vtec setup to support roller rockers. the VTEC design isnt required for drag racing as you dont need a shift bewteen "economy" and "performance" valve settings. this is the ONLY reason why drag racers dont "whoop" about VTEC.

so for a decent street machine, VTEC would be great for day to day driveability. for track only performance, it's not needed.

plus, starting a power build from a 200hp platform makes more power than starting with a platform of 160hp with equivalent modifications.

crj_lll
04-16-2003, 05:36 PM
I kind of lost you, in the middle of your response. How would you take a VTEC and dial the VTEC engage point down to ZERO so that the car tran a more agressive profile at all times?

drift
04-16-2003, 05:47 PM
Originally posted by crj_lll
I kind of lost you, in the middle of your response. How would you take a VTEC and dial the VTEC engage point down to ZERO so that the car tran a more agressive profile at all times?


no one said anything about dialing down VTEC.

it's a rocker assembly and cam swap for the Ferrea rocker system

crj_lll
04-16-2003, 11:29 PM
when you swap that out, the H@@ will run the more aggressive profile the entire time? Where can I find this and how much do they run? Does this increase the overall torque and horsepower or will it crease the power band and rang of peak horsepower and torque. Please bare with me. Just learning this new technique.

iceiso
04-17-2003, 11:45 AM
i'm trying to get around 300 (+/- 10)HP. what kind of boost should i be running? there's something i didn't really understand though...

i heard that when you build up your internals, your compression goes down and low compression w/o turbo=BAD. sooo, does that mean that i'll have to build up, and drop the turbo in at the same time?

could someone please verify/correct me, and explain? thanks!

1320B4U
04-25-2003, 01:13 AM
You should choose Turbo or VTEC from the start. If you want to break into the 13's your gonna have to go turbo. I would buy an H23 block, blockguard it, some forged pistons(9:1 or less C/R), eagle forged rods are a good value, then you need a turbocharger and turbo manifold, full 3" exhaust, Front mount intercooler, BOV, some larger injectors(450cc+), fuel pump, ignition, various gauges(A/F, boost, egt, ...), and someway to control it all i.e. standalone, or various piggybacks. 20 lbs. of boost and you'll be gone(given you can find traction).
If you want 300 wheel horsepower the h22 isnt gonna get you there unless you do a turbo rebuild (lower C/R), so why not start with a cheaper block and not have the VTEC mess as drift stated. I think if VTEC was engaged all the time the car would run like crap down low and get horrid gas mileage. Ive heard VTEC with high boost is not good because the higher lift duration of the cams lets the boost pressure blow by or something similar to that.

My $.02

drift
04-25-2003, 04:10 PM
Originally posted by 1320B4U
You should choose Turbo or VTEC from the start. If you want to break into the 13's your gonna have to go turbo. I would buy an H23 block, blockguard it, some forged pistons(9:1 or less C/R), eagle forged rods are a good value, then you need a turbocharger and turbo manifold, full 3" exhaust, Front mount intercooler, BOV, some larger injectors(450cc+), fuel pump, ignition, various gauges(A/F, boost, egt, ...), and someway to control it all i.e. standalone, or various piggybacks. 20 lbs. of boost and you'll be gone(given you can find traction).
If you want 300 wheel horsepower the h22 isnt gonna get you there unless you do a turbo rebuild (lower C/R), so why not start with a cheaper block and not have the VTEC mess as drift stated. I think if VTEC was engaged all the time the car would run like crap down low and get horrid gas mileage. Ive heard VTEC with high boost is not good because the higher lift duration of the cams lets the boost pressure blow by or something similar to that.

My $.02


H23 doesnt need a blockguard. it's a solid deck.

to handle 20+ psi, both H22 and H23 will need iron sleeves. they both come stock with FRM.

with all the shit you mentioned doing to the H23, you follow it up with, "the h22 isnt going to get you there unless you do a turbo rebuild". all the shit you listed for the H23 is what you normally do to ANY motor for turbo strengthening.

so either way, according to you, it would just as expensive for either one... but at least with the H22, you start off with 200hp instead of 160hp. 40 more hp towards a goal of 300 sounds like a deal to me.

overlap can be an issue with VTEC, but that can be dialed out with cam gears on a stock cam, or grinding of the lobes on a performance cam. and both ways will not mess with lift... just lobe degree to reduce duration, but it will increase ramp speeds, requiring a head build.

civickiller
04-26-2003, 03:19 AM
theres a reason why these big name racers dont use the h22a.

i read something about the h22a having really thin cylinder sleeves

drift
04-26-2003, 05:25 AM
Originally posted by civickiller
theres a reason why these big name racers dont use the h22a.

i read something about the h22a having really thin cylinder sleeves


steph papadakis doesnt use the H22?

actually, it's cuz if they drop an H22 into a civic, they're forced to run outlaw class or pro class, depending on the sanctioning body, due to certain frame and suspension requirements to work efficiently. most of them cant afford to stay in outlaw as they dont have as much financial backing as steph and the AEM/Greddy team.

the apexi Drag Integra also had a highly modified H22.


as for the cylinder sleeves, that doesnt become an issue once it's reseeved.

iceiso
05-10-2003, 01:58 AM
aaaaaalright, been doing alot of research around and i've learned alot since the first post.

it's still not final, but i've shifted my interests towards a h23. slightly larger displacement, and no vtec to mess with.

i think i'm going to get a higher mileage h23 for cheaper, and build it up again. w/h22a, i would eventually need a vtec controller, more tuning...more $$$ and i would need to replace so many parts that it would seem like a waste...

alright, i have some more questions now though...

where a reputable place to buy an h23 from? hmotorsonline only has the longblock.

will hondata stage II work on both h22a and h23a? the h22a has so much more support, it seems. i looked on the prelude section and the fastest prelude there is a fully built h23, which was kinda how i decided...i can spend more of the money building, rather than tuning something i spent so much money to have (vtec).

is this incoherent? it's 3 am and i'm tired, hahaha. thanks for replies!

grrrr
05-10-2003, 03:58 AM
i like this link..... http://d1profiles.tripod.com/walter.htm#turbo
i just only wish they would tell alot more about it. but 10lbs boost fully stock... i guess thats not bad.

iceiso
05-10-2003, 12:37 PM
ooo, 10 pounds. that's pretty nice. has anyone found a good place to buy this motor?

also, why exactly is the h22a 40 HP more than the h23a. is it because of the higher redline and vtec? also, how much would a computer like hondata raise redline? i can probably live without vtec since i'll have a turbo, but a 6500 redline is too similar to the accord i already have! lol.

do i need to resleeve my block? what are some good choices for ignition, and fuel system upgrades?

w/forged rods, pistons, 450CC injectors, fuel pump, ignition, and proper management, around how much boost is possible? is there anything that i didn't add that would be creating a bottleneck for more boost?

iceiso
05-10-2003, 07:51 PM
oh yeah, 9.0:1 compression pistons.

K_millar
07-15-2003, 10:21 PM
Just put a Mazda 13B in your Accord..

1320B4U
07-16-2003, 02:39 AM
If you call or email companys that build pistons/rods, im sure they have them off the shelf for an H23 with different overbores.

" also, why exactly is the h22a 40 HP more than the h23a. is it because of the higher redline and vtec? also, how much would a computer like hondata raise redline? i can probably live without vtec since i'll have a turbo, but a 6500 redline is too similar to the accord i already have! lol. "

Its basically the higher comp. ratio and VTEC. Think of an old muscle car with real lumpy cams, horrid idle and my guess gas mileage. When the H22 switches over to VTEC at around 5k, thats what happens of course. So thats where the extra 30-40 HP come from.

"so either way, according to you, it would just as expensive for either one... but at least with the H22, you start off with 200hp instead of 160hp. 40 more hp towards a goal of 300 sounds like a deal to me."

Expensive for both yes. So why not start with a $400 H23 rather than pay $1,000+ for an H22 and disable VTEC(there goes that extra 40HP) when your boosting 20+psi? That extra $600 is a set of nice forged pistons or rods. Or a wastegate and turbo mani. Or some injectors and intake mani. Most people work on a budget.

"w/forged rods, pistons, 450CC injectors, fuel pump, ignition, and proper management, around how much boost is possible? is there anything that i didn't add that would be creating a bottleneck for more boost?"

Well, with 2.3L and 18-20psi on the street, you might need 550's, shit maybe even 660's depending on what turbo you choose. If your aiming to be a street terror you'll want fast spool and decent top end. I have a Big16g on my 2.0L, full spool(18psi street) at 3200rpm revving out to 7200. But I can still hit 12's at the track. With 2.3L you'll spool a turbo larger than mine quicker, but then again your FWD so thats not always a good thing on street tires. But if you went with a beastly large turbo(50-60 trim, 700+CubicFeetMinute) you would kill just about anything from about 40mph-up to top end 150mph+(where traction isn't much of an issue). Bottlenecks, lots of fuel, huge intercooler(Spearco 216), nothing but 93+ octane, maybe a ported head, bigger throttle body, intake mani or extrude hone the stocker, High Rev Kit(springs, retainers, SS valves, turbo cams) if you want to rev to 7500rpm or so with all that top end boost.

Add your comment to this topic!


Quality Real Meat Nutrition for Dogs: Best Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef Dog Food | Best Beef Dog Food