Prisoners Of War executed
ales
03-29-2003, 11:16 PM
Originally posted by GTi-VR6_A3
that still doesnt make anything done by the US illegal...
-GTi-VR6_A3
Sigh.
Chapter I, Article 2, Paragraph 4.
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
that still doesnt make anything done by the US illegal...
-GTi-VR6_A3
Sigh.
Chapter I, Article 2, Paragraph 4.
All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.
Prelewd
03-29-2003, 11:22 PM
Didn't someone mention in this forum that the UN wanted Saddam to disarm?
GTi-VR6_A3
03-29-2003, 11:25 PM
Originally posted by Prelewd
Didn't someone mention in this forum that the UN wanted Saddam to disarm?
uhh yeha that was me. that is the charte but as soon as the un votes on a resolution that says force is allowed then force is allowed.
-GTi-VR6_A3
Didn't someone mention in this forum that the UN wanted Saddam to disarm?
uhh yeha that was me. that is the charte but as soon as the un votes on a resolution that says force is allowed then force is allowed.
-GTi-VR6_A3
T4 Primera
03-29-2003, 11:50 PM
Originally posted by GTi-VR6_A3
uhh yeha that was me. that is the charte but as soon as the un votes on a resolution that says force is allowed then force is allowed.
-GTi-VR6_A3 Can anyone quote that resolution for me? I'd like to read it - thanks.
uhh yeha that was me. that is the charte but as soon as the un votes on a resolution that says force is allowed then force is allowed.
-GTi-VR6_A3 Can anyone quote that resolution for me? I'd like to read it - thanks.
taranaki
03-29-2003, 11:54 PM
Originally posted by T4 Primera
Can anyone quote that resolution for me? I'd like to read it - thanks.
resolution 1441.
http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/2002/sc2002.htm
Can anyone quote that resolution for me? I'd like to read it - thanks.
resolution 1441.
http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/2002/sc2002.htm
jon@af
03-31-2003, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by taranaki
resolution 1441.
http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/2002/sc2002.htm
Some argue that had Iraq followed this resolution, war would have been prevented. I like to think otherwise:rolleyes:
resolution 1441.
http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/2002/sc2002.htm
Some argue that had Iraq followed this resolution, war would have been prevented. I like to think otherwise:rolleyes:
T4 Primera
03-31-2003, 03:42 PM
Originally posted by ILike2DriveCars
Some argue that had Iraq followed this resolution, war would have been prevented. I like to think otherwise:rolleyes: One of those who say they did follow that resolution just happened to be the Chief UN Weapons Inspector. I like to think he would be the most qualified to make that judgement.
Some argue that had Iraq followed this resolution, war would have been prevented. I like to think otherwise:rolleyes: One of those who say they did follow that resolution just happened to be the Chief UN Weapons Inspector. I like to think he would be the most qualified to make that judgement.
Prelewd
03-31-2003, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by T4 Primera
One of those who say they did follow that resolution just happened to be the Chief UN Weapons Inspector. I like to think he would be the most qualified to make that judgement.
I like to think president Bush, being the president, is the most qualified person to run this country, but some say otherwise.
One of those who say they did follow that resolution just happened to be the Chief UN Weapons Inspector. I like to think he would be the most qualified to make that judgement.
I like to think president Bush, being the president, is the most qualified person to run this country, but some say otherwise.
taranaki
03-31-2003, 07:58 PM
Originally posted by Prelewd
I like to think president Bush, being the president, is the most qualified person to run this country, but some say otherwise.
Count me among those that say otherwise.Last I heard,there was no internationally recognised tertiary qualification in How To Be A Head Of State.Being in charge doesn't automatically mean that you make the best decisions.Sure,you have access to a lot more information to make your decision,but if you choose to ignore the parts of it that don't fit your ideas,then that information becomes worthless.
I like to think president Bush, being the president, is the most qualified person to run this country, but some say otherwise.
Count me among those that say otherwise.Last I heard,there was no internationally recognised tertiary qualification in How To Be A Head Of State.Being in charge doesn't automatically mean that you make the best decisions.Sure,you have access to a lot more information to make your decision,but if you choose to ignore the parts of it that don't fit your ideas,then that information becomes worthless.
Prelewd
03-31-2003, 08:24 PM
Originally posted by T4 Primera
One of those who say they did follow that resolution just happened to be the Chief UN Weapons Inspector. I like to think he would be the most qualified to make that judgement.
Originally posted by taranaki
Being in charge doesn't automatically mean that you make the best decisions.
Point made.
One of those who say they did follow that resolution just happened to be the Chief UN Weapons Inspector. I like to think he would be the most qualified to make that judgement.
Originally posted by taranaki
Being in charge doesn't automatically mean that you make the best decisions.
Point made.
T4 Primera
03-31-2003, 08:59 PM
Originally posted by Prelewd
Point made. I suggested Hans Blix the best qualified to make the judgement on WMD and resolution 1441. You suggested that GW Bush the best qualified to make decisions on running the US. The problem I have is when one of them decides to make decisions beyond his jurisdiction.
Point made. I suggested Hans Blix the best qualified to make the judgement on WMD and resolution 1441. You suggested that GW Bush the best qualified to make decisions on running the US. The problem I have is when one of them decides to make decisions beyond his jurisdiction.
Prelewd
03-31-2003, 09:56 PM
I'm sorry, I was just making the point that just because he is the cheif UN weapons inspector doesn't mean he has the best judgement of Saddam's following of 1441. Similar to how people say that just because Bush is the president of the USA, doesn't mean he has the best judgement about what to do with the country. Basically, titles are irrelevant, but, in most cases, this isn't true.
jon@af
03-31-2003, 11:12 PM
Originally posted by Prelewd
....just because he is the cheif UN weapons inspector doesn't mean he has the best judgement of Saddam's following of 1441....
Couldnt have said it better myself.
....just because he is the cheif UN weapons inspector doesn't mean he has the best judgement of Saddam's following of 1441....
Couldnt have said it better myself.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025