Our Community is over 1 Million Strong. Join Us.

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD

why fast? :/


ernesto821
12-17-2008, 01:33 AM
hi,
i was looking at rsx type-s comparisons with other cars such as 2005+ mustang v6 4.0L , subrau wrx (not sti) and audi tt 1.8t. of all 3, rsx have the lowest torque/hp yet it still beat/have comparable performance with the others~ if you compare the torque, it is like 50+ ft-lb behind all the other cars in question. can anyone enlighten me why this is the case? i m trying to decide which one of those i should get..

mmont0
12-19-2008, 02:47 PM
You have to take a look at the weight of the car as well. The Subaru is 4WD which adds weight to the car, the Audi is also heavy as is the Mustang. Seeing that the RSX is only ~2700 lbs the power/torque to weight ratio is probably on the same level as these other cars.

Add your comment to this topic!