War Protesters Hate Muslims?
Luetic
02-16-2003, 07:11 AM
Saddam has slaughtered more Muslims than anyone in the world. So, I guess the protesters want to stop the U.S. from removing him from power so that he can continue to murder hundreds of thousands of more Muslims. Those people must really hate muslims to want to keep him in power. :rolleyes:
Cbass
02-16-2003, 04:55 PM
:huh:
jon@af
02-16-2003, 08:12 PM
Originally posted by Cbass
:huh:
Ill ditto that.
:huh:
Ill ditto that.
Jimster
02-17-2003, 01:50 AM
Noooo..........We don't want the USA killing Muslims- because that is what will happen if Bush goes to war with Iraq. What Saddam does in his soil is his buisiness- so long as he is not any form of danger to the rest of us- Which he is not.
Cbass
02-17-2003, 02:03 AM
Quickly Jim, there's no time! Kill the thread before further stupidity ensues! :hehehe:
Cbass
02-17-2003, 02:04 AM
I've been waiting for a good 6 years for the right opportunity to use this Star Trek quote...
<looks at Luetic>
He's worse than dead, Jim, his brain is gone!
<looks at Luetic>
He's worse than dead, Jim, his brain is gone!
racingbreed20
02-17-2003, 02:05 AM
If you're not in america dont be concerned with what Bush is doing NAH!!
Jimster
02-17-2003, 02:41 AM
Originally posted by racingbreed20
If you're not in america dont be concerned with what Bush is doing NAH!!
Bushes actions can quite easily affect the world economy- if he wages war- Petroleum prices will skyrocket, the sharemarket will crash and the worlds economies will all suffer because of one silly moron who loves missiles more than his wife.
CBass- I think this thread will be funny- Especially when the starter tries to back up his ridiculous claims :rolleyes:
If you're not in america dont be concerned with what Bush is doing NAH!!
Bushes actions can quite easily affect the world economy- if he wages war- Petroleum prices will skyrocket, the sharemarket will crash and the worlds economies will all suffer because of one silly moron who loves missiles more than his wife.
CBass- I think this thread will be funny- Especially when the starter tries to back up his ridiculous claims :rolleyes:
taranaki
02-17-2003, 08:07 AM
Originally posted by Luetic
Saddam has slaughtered more Muslims than anyone in the world. So, I guess the protesters want to stop the U.S. from removing him from power so that he can continue to murder hundreds of thousands of more Muslims. Those people must really hate muslims to want to keep him in power. :rolleyes:
That is just so silly.When you go to kindergarten tommorrow tell little johnny he must be wrong.
LET'S KEEP THIS SIMPLE FOR YOU.There are millions of people who are opposed to a war of any kind in Iraq.George Bush has damn-all to back up his excuses for an invasion,and the U.N. report is quite clear that they believe that more inspections and negotiations can bring this issue to an end without a single U.S.bomb ever falling on Iraq.
AMERICA HAS NO MORAL AUTHORITY TO START A WAR.PERIOD
That is what people are protesting about.To suggest that those of us who oppose the ignorant hatred that is U.S. foreign policy are doing so because we hate muslims is beneath contempt.
Saddam has slaughtered more Muslims than anyone in the world. So, I guess the protesters want to stop the U.S. from removing him from power so that he can continue to murder hundreds of thousands of more Muslims. Those people must really hate muslims to want to keep him in power. :rolleyes:
That is just so silly.When you go to kindergarten tommorrow tell little johnny he must be wrong.
LET'S KEEP THIS SIMPLE FOR YOU.There are millions of people who are opposed to a war of any kind in Iraq.George Bush has damn-all to back up his excuses for an invasion,and the U.N. report is quite clear that they believe that more inspections and negotiations can bring this issue to an end without a single U.S.bomb ever falling on Iraq.
AMERICA HAS NO MORAL AUTHORITY TO START A WAR.PERIOD
That is what people are protesting about.To suggest that those of us who oppose the ignorant hatred that is U.S. foreign policy are doing so because we hate muslims is beneath contempt.
jon@af
02-17-2003, 09:18 AM
Originally posted by racingbreed20
If you're not in america dont be concerned with what Bush is doing NAH!!
NAH? I dont get it, could someone please explain this to me before someone gets called a poo-poo head.
I agree with Jimster. To say that this only concerns America is obviously ignorant. This concerns the global community. If there is war it wont just be "Iraq and America" at war, it will be allies of either one, as well as their allies. Then when you throw N. Korea into the lot, geez...
If you're not in america dont be concerned with what Bush is doing NAH!!
NAH? I dont get it, could someone please explain this to me before someone gets called a poo-poo head.
I agree with Jimster. To say that this only concerns America is obviously ignorant. This concerns the global community. If there is war it wont just be "Iraq and America" at war, it will be allies of either one, as well as their allies. Then when you throw N. Korea into the lot, geez...
YogsVR4
02-17-2003, 10:05 AM
It fun watching you guys fall back to your shrilling about Iraq. I know you dont care who Saddam kills. Its only important to you who Americans kill or dont kill. Thats fine. You've made your opinions clear.
I will remind you however that the UN is a useless organization. The sooner it folds into oblivion the better. The UN where Libyia is oversees human rights and Iraq handles disarmament. Thats ok with the anti-American zealots here.
I will remind you however that the UN is a useless organization. The sooner it folds into oblivion the better. The UN where Libyia is oversees human rights and Iraq handles disarmament. Thats ok with the anti-American zealots here.
Tackle Trap
02-17-2003, 12:40 PM
I agree with Yogs.
The damn guy(Saddam) has weapons of mass destruction!Which doesnt only affect America.If he gets the chance,he will bomb not only the U.S.,but many other countrys around the world.You think Bush wants to go to war?I dont.But its one of those that needs to be done.Saddam NEEDS to be killed.He loves mudering people.In this case,Muslims.And you guys are saying its the U.S. that will be killing them if we go to war?Thats stupid to think that.If the U.S. likes to kill people,just remeber,who saved your country from being under Hitlers power.I love how everything gets blammed somehow on America.And I can almost guarantee you all that we will see a world war in the next few years.
The damn guy(Saddam) has weapons of mass destruction!Which doesnt only affect America.If he gets the chance,he will bomb not only the U.S.,but many other countrys around the world.You think Bush wants to go to war?I dont.But its one of those that needs to be done.Saddam NEEDS to be killed.He loves mudering people.In this case,Muslims.And you guys are saying its the U.S. that will be killing them if we go to war?Thats stupid to think that.If the U.S. likes to kill people,just remeber,who saved your country from being under Hitlers power.I love how everything gets blammed somehow on America.And I can almost guarantee you all that we will see a world war in the next few years.
Jimster
02-17-2003, 11:03 PM
Originally posted by Tackle Trap
I agree with Yogs.
The damn guy(Saddam) has weapons of mass destruction!Which doesnt only affect America.If he gets the chance,he will bomb not only the U.S.,but many other countrys around the world.You think Bush wants to go to war?I dont.But its one of those that needs to be done.Saddam NEEDS to be killed.He loves mudering people.In this case,Muslims.And you guys are saying its the U.S. that will be killing them if we go to war?Thats stupid to think that.If the U.S. likes to kill people,just remeber,who saved your country from being under Hitlers power.I love how everything gets blammed somehow on America.And I can almost guarantee you all that we will see a world war in the next few years.
I will repeat what has been said a million times- THE UN INSPECTORS HAVE NOT FOUND ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTON- JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF CHEMICALS AND A FEW ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS
When Bush delivers his weak-ass propoganda he looks more and more like Hitler each time.
If anyone is going to start World War III it is Bush- and quite frankly if some crazed Muslim knocks him off- it's his own fault. And it was the Russians that marched into Berlin and drove Hitler to suicide.
Yogs- You keep hating on the UN- but you have never given a justifiable reason as to why you do........Funny that :rolleyes:
I agree with Yogs.
The damn guy(Saddam) has weapons of mass destruction!Which doesnt only affect America.If he gets the chance,he will bomb not only the U.S.,but many other countrys around the world.You think Bush wants to go to war?I dont.But its one of those that needs to be done.Saddam NEEDS to be killed.He loves mudering people.In this case,Muslims.And you guys are saying its the U.S. that will be killing them if we go to war?Thats stupid to think that.If the U.S. likes to kill people,just remeber,who saved your country from being under Hitlers power.I love how everything gets blammed somehow on America.And I can almost guarantee you all that we will see a world war in the next few years.
I will repeat what has been said a million times- THE UN INSPECTORS HAVE NOT FOUND ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTON- JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF CHEMICALS AND A FEW ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS
When Bush delivers his weak-ass propoganda he looks more and more like Hitler each time.
If anyone is going to start World War III it is Bush- and quite frankly if some crazed Muslim knocks him off- it's his own fault. And it was the Russians that marched into Berlin and drove Hitler to suicide.
Yogs- You keep hating on the UN- but you have never given a justifiable reason as to why you do........Funny that :rolleyes:
Cbass
02-18-2003, 03:51 AM
Originally posted by YogsVR4
It fun watching you guys fall back to your shrilling about Iraq. I know you dont care who Saddam kills. Its only important to you who Americans kill or dont kill. Thats fine. You've made your opinions clear.
Well, let's see who Saddam has killed... Many Iranians, because the US agreed to back him in a war against Iran, with the US objective of destablizing the region, and obtaining cheap oil. A few Kuwaitis, when they began tapping Iraqs largest oil field with the intent of provoking a war. Oh, let's not forget gassing his "own people", the Kurds, a seperate ethnic group in the north of Iraq, who are trying to break away from Iraq, using terrorism? Sort of like what the zionists did immediately before the formation of Israel?
It seems when you take a closer look at the "evidence" the US uses to incriminate Saddam, it turns out to be carefully spun propaganda.
As for who the US kills, we should expect a better standard of actions from the world's sole superpower, than from a dictator of an impoverished middle eastern nation.
Originally posted by YogsVR4
I will remind you however that the UN is a useless organization. The sooner it folds into oblivion the better. The UN where Libyia is oversees human rights and Iraq handles disarmament. Thats ok with the anti-American zealots here.
Once again, you display an irrational hatred of the UN, and I'm curious as to why. The only thing that makes the UN ineffective is the US intervention to protect their interests.
Anti American zealots? You have some serious issues, Yogs. I am certainly not anti-American, and neither is anyone else here. Just because our views conflict with your right wing rhetoric, doesn't mean we hate your country.
It fun watching you guys fall back to your shrilling about Iraq. I know you dont care who Saddam kills. Its only important to you who Americans kill or dont kill. Thats fine. You've made your opinions clear.
Well, let's see who Saddam has killed... Many Iranians, because the US agreed to back him in a war against Iran, with the US objective of destablizing the region, and obtaining cheap oil. A few Kuwaitis, when they began tapping Iraqs largest oil field with the intent of provoking a war. Oh, let's not forget gassing his "own people", the Kurds, a seperate ethnic group in the north of Iraq, who are trying to break away from Iraq, using terrorism? Sort of like what the zionists did immediately before the formation of Israel?
It seems when you take a closer look at the "evidence" the US uses to incriminate Saddam, it turns out to be carefully spun propaganda.
As for who the US kills, we should expect a better standard of actions from the world's sole superpower, than from a dictator of an impoverished middle eastern nation.
Originally posted by YogsVR4
I will remind you however that the UN is a useless organization. The sooner it folds into oblivion the better. The UN where Libyia is oversees human rights and Iraq handles disarmament. Thats ok with the anti-American zealots here.
Once again, you display an irrational hatred of the UN, and I'm curious as to why. The only thing that makes the UN ineffective is the US intervention to protect their interests.
Anti American zealots? You have some serious issues, Yogs. I am certainly not anti-American, and neither is anyone else here. Just because our views conflict with your right wing rhetoric, doesn't mean we hate your country.
Luetic
02-18-2003, 08:46 PM
I will repeat what has been said a million times- THE UN INSPECTORS HAVE NOT FOUND ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTON- JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF CHEMICALS AND A FEW ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS
You seem to have not understood resolution 1441. The inspectors are NOT there to go on a scavenger hunt! They are there to Confirm how he is destroying his weapons. Saddam signed off to the list of weapons that he has. It is not what the U.S. says he has, it is a list that Saddam says that he has. Iraq has not shown where they have eliminated any weapons. Where is his V-X gas? His anthrax? They are buried deep underground in well hidden bunkers that's where. Inspectors will not find them. It is not their job to find them. It IS their job to confirm the destruction of the weapons.
You seem to have not understood resolution 1441. The inspectors are NOT there to go on a scavenger hunt! They are there to Confirm how he is destroying his weapons. Saddam signed off to the list of weapons that he has. It is not what the U.S. says he has, it is a list that Saddam says that he has. Iraq has not shown where they have eliminated any weapons. Where is his V-X gas? His anthrax? They are buried deep underground in well hidden bunkers that's where. Inspectors will not find them. It is not their job to find them. It IS their job to confirm the destruction of the weapons.
Jimster
02-18-2003, 08:56 PM
Originally posted by Luetic
You seem to have not understood resolution 1441. The inspectors are NOT there to go on a scavenger hunt! They are there to Confirm how he is destroying his weapons. Saddam signed off to the list of weapons that he has. It is not what the U.S. says he has, it is a list that Saddam says that he has. Iraq has not shown where they have eliminated any weapons. Where is his V-X gas? His anthrax? They are buried deep underground in well hidden bunkers that's where. Inspectors will not find them. It is not their job to find them. It IS their job to confirm the destruction of the weapons.
For chrissake this is real life- not blasted Rouge Spear :rolleyes:
Saddam has never used WMD's- He has had many provokations to- but has never done so
You seem to have not understood resolution 1441. The inspectors are NOT there to go on a scavenger hunt! They are there to Confirm how he is destroying his weapons. Saddam signed off to the list of weapons that he has. It is not what the U.S. says he has, it is a list that Saddam says that he has. Iraq has not shown where they have eliminated any weapons. Where is his V-X gas? His anthrax? They are buried deep underground in well hidden bunkers that's where. Inspectors will not find them. It is not their job to find them. It IS their job to confirm the destruction of the weapons.
For chrissake this is real life- not blasted Rouge Spear :rolleyes:
Saddam has never used WMD's- He has had many provokations to- but has never done so
Cbass
02-18-2003, 09:18 PM
Originally posted by Luetic
I will repeat what has been said a million times- THE UN INSPECTORS HAVE NOT FOUND ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTON- JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF CHEMICALS AND A FEW ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS
You seem to have not understood resolution 1441. The inspectors are NOT there to go on a scavenger hunt! They are there to Confirm how he is destroying his weapons. Saddam signed off to the list of weapons that he has. It is not what the U.S. says he has, it is a list that Saddam says that he has. Iraq has not shown where they have eliminated any weapons. Where is his V-X gas? His anthrax? They are buried deep underground in well hidden bunkers that's where. Inspectors will not find them. It is not their job to find them. It IS their job to confirm the destruction of the weapons.
Well, that's if you go by these claims that the US makes, that are completely unsubstantiated. I don't buy for a minute that they have evidence and can't bring it forward. The way the US is chomping at the bit for war, they'd have brought ANY evidence they had before the UN long ago.
The only "evidence" they could come up with was a dossier of decades old intelligence, detailing weapons that were confirmed destroyed by the first UNSCOM team, and the rest was plagiarized from a university students paper from some years ago.
I will repeat what has been said a million times- THE UN INSPECTORS HAVE NOT FOUND ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTON- JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF CHEMICALS AND A FEW ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS
You seem to have not understood resolution 1441. The inspectors are NOT there to go on a scavenger hunt! They are there to Confirm how he is destroying his weapons. Saddam signed off to the list of weapons that he has. It is not what the U.S. says he has, it is a list that Saddam says that he has. Iraq has not shown where they have eliminated any weapons. Where is his V-X gas? His anthrax? They are buried deep underground in well hidden bunkers that's where. Inspectors will not find them. It is not their job to find them. It IS their job to confirm the destruction of the weapons.
Well, that's if you go by these claims that the US makes, that are completely unsubstantiated. I don't buy for a minute that they have evidence and can't bring it forward. The way the US is chomping at the bit for war, they'd have brought ANY evidence they had before the UN long ago.
The only "evidence" they could come up with was a dossier of decades old intelligence, detailing weapons that were confirmed destroyed by the first UNSCOM team, and the rest was plagiarized from a university students paper from some years ago.
Luetic
02-20-2003, 10:58 PM
Originally posted by Cbass
Well, that's if you go by these claims that the US makes, that are completely unsubstantiated. I don't buy for a minute that they have evidence and can't bring it forward.
Unsubstantiated? The list of weapons that the U.N. has are a list that was provided By Iraq. Saddam signed-off as to what weapons he had and would destroy. It isn't some made up list. Saddam made the list and gave it to the U.N.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021903/content/from.parcol1.0001.ImageFile.jpg http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021903/content/from.parcol2.0001.ImageFile.jpg
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021903/content/from.parcol2.0002.ImageFile.jpg
Well, that's if you go by these claims that the US makes, that are completely unsubstantiated. I don't buy for a minute that they have evidence and can't bring it forward.
Unsubstantiated? The list of weapons that the U.N. has are a list that was provided By Iraq. Saddam signed-off as to what weapons he had and would destroy. It isn't some made up list. Saddam made the list and gave it to the U.N.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021903/content/from.parcol1.0001.ImageFile.jpg http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021903/content/from.parcol2.0001.ImageFile.jpg
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021903/content/from.parcol2.0002.ImageFile.jpg
Monkey-Magic-S15-R
02-21-2003, 07:42 AM
Originally posted by Jimster
Bushes actions can quite easily affect the world economy- if he wages war- Petroleum prices will skyrocket, the sharemarket will crash and the worlds economies will all suffer because of one silly moron who loves missiles more than his wife.
CBass- I think this thread will be funny- Especially when the starter tries to back up his ridiculous claims :rolleyes:
the world economy is already in deep shit we don't need a dipshit like Bush to do anything else to make it worse its not like he won the presidential election fairly or anything
Bushes actions can quite easily affect the world economy- if he wages war- Petroleum prices will skyrocket, the sharemarket will crash and the worlds economies will all suffer because of one silly moron who loves missiles more than his wife.
CBass- I think this thread will be funny- Especially when the starter tries to back up his ridiculous claims :rolleyes:
the world economy is already in deep shit we don't need a dipshit like Bush to do anything else to make it worse its not like he won the presidential election fairly or anything
Cbass
02-21-2003, 04:55 PM
Originally posted by Luetic
Unsubstantiated? The list of weapons that the U.N. has are a list that was provided By Iraq. Saddam signed-off as to what weapons he had and would destroy. It isn't some made up list. Saddam made the list and gave it to the U.N.
Yes, everyone is aware he has those weapons, and there are extremely limited numbers of chemical weapons declared by Saddam. Now you can say "that's because he's hiding them!", but that is absurd. Even if he is hiding chemical weapons for some bizarre reason, it has not, and cannot be proven that he is, so that makes a very poor excuse for a war.
The US comprimised the integrity of that list when they seized it and spirited it off to Washington, on the grounds that the UN did not have adequately secure copying facilities.
Unsubstantiated? The list of weapons that the U.N. has are a list that was provided By Iraq. Saddam signed-off as to what weapons he had and would destroy. It isn't some made up list. Saddam made the list and gave it to the U.N.
Yes, everyone is aware he has those weapons, and there are extremely limited numbers of chemical weapons declared by Saddam. Now you can say "that's because he's hiding them!", but that is absurd. Even if he is hiding chemical weapons for some bizarre reason, it has not, and cannot be proven that he is, so that makes a very poor excuse for a war.
The US comprimised the integrity of that list when they seized it and spirited it off to Washington, on the grounds that the UN did not have adequately secure copying facilities.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2026