british propaganda found to be based on deceit

Britain's dossier on Iraq proves to be little more than a re-hash of an American university student's 1991 thesis.-


http://asia.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/02/07/sprj.irq.uk.dossier/

Ibrahim Al Marashi,the original author has disclaimed the document,saying that key phrases have been edited to put a more aggressive spin on his work.He did not consent to his work being used and is accusing the British government of' theft of intellectual property' and plagiarism.

Way to go Tony Blair.:rolleyes:

http://www.beardo.com/b3ta/iraqrep.gif

i'd like to point out the thesis was a identical to the University's Student's Thesis not the main text which apparently had some real fact and substance whereas the thesis did not. Colin Powell referred to the dossier but the sections he referred to was not of that of the Students thesis but that of the main dossier.

The idea that the whole thing was a rehash is blaintant propoganda of those against a war.

Originally posted by Monkey-Magic-S15-R

The idea that the whole thing was a rehash is blaintant propoganda of those against a war.

There are sections of the British report that have been copied word for word,mistakes and all, from a student paper that was written using historical data from the early nineties.That is a fact.Try to learn the difference between facts and propaganda.